Skip to main content

Venniro et al. (2018) & De Guglielmo et al. (2019)

By
Venniro et al. (2018) is my favorite paper of any we have read thus far in class. In part because of how blunt it is in calling out neuroscientific research’s deficits in studying the social aspect of addiction (I for some reason found this very humorous), but mainly because I could see just exactly how translational this research is. It is pretty amazing that they were able to show that rats prefer social interaction over self-administration of meth or heroin; I found it especially interesting in the context of animal receiving a punishment. It made me think about how if a support structure in humans is not rewarding enough, then someone might self-administer. Some ideas this gave me about additional experiments that might provide even more information about the social aspect of addiction were to have the ‘social partner’ instead be an aggressor to see if making the relationship even less rewarding would make the rat want to self-administer or if it is just the social interaction in general, regardless of whether it is healthy, that is driving the rat to not administer and abstain. Another interesting experiment could be to have the ‘social partner’ be a rat that is an addict. Would this influence the rat to ditch their friend and go self-administer?
De Guglielmo et al. (2019) I felt was less translational but still a solid paper. I think it would be cool to see if they could use a pharmacological manipulation instead of optogenetic inhibition as that would be more applicable to humans but this paper provides a good baseline. Also I would have like to see other evaluations of anxiety-like behaviors (it seems they on performed an open field apparatus) because from my understanding CRF plays a big role in stress response and that can cause significant changes in anxiety levels so it would have been to see support of this.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more