Skip to main content

Post 9: Animal models of addiction prevention and reversal

By
Many papers we have studied this semester have focused on the induction of mental illness in mental illness as a means of understanding disease and potentially recognizing targets for treatment. While these efforts are very beneficial and make headway in the field, I was excited that Venniro et al. (2018) and de Guglielmo et al. (2019) focused directly on preventing and reversing models of mental illness—specifically addiction. While the papers used very different methods to do so, both identified neuronal ensembles in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) as being important for aspects of addiction. These overlapping findings helped to confirm my understanding of the significance of the CeA in relation to addiction. As neurotransmitters were only briefly discussed in these papers and GABA and glutamate are known to have roles in addiction, I would be very interested in learning more about the roles of GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission in the CeA’s mediation of addictive behaviors. 

While the aforementioned findings about the CeA’s role in addiction, as well as many others in de Guglielmo, were strong and well-supported, I found it difficult to ignore the lack of clarity of their methods. The timelines for many of the procedures including operant self-administration of alcohol and saccharine, behavioral testing, and ethanol self-administration sessions during vapor exposure contained numerous gaps that would make this experiment difficult to replicate. Additionally, a number of small mistakes in the text in reference to figures added to the confusion I had in comprehending the methods. A final minor critique of the de Guglielmo paper is that its suggestions for future study, while important to consider, do not call upon previously discussed limitations of the paper, though they seem to be presented as such. I was somewhat surprised by these suggestions when I came to them, instead expecting recommendations about studying the role of neurotransmitters in the CRFCeA-BNST pathway or further investigation of the CRF-CRF1system.

Thinking more broadly, the findings of Venniro et al. increased my concern and curiosity about the effects of current mandated social distancing on individuals suffering from mental illnesses. While I have reflected on the negative effects that staying at home may have for those with depression, widespread uncertainty about the future may have for those with anxiety, and endless demands to wash hands may have on those with obsessive compulsive disorder, I have not as closely considered how social distancing may increase drug addiction. Learning about the protective factors of social interaction in rodent models of addiction significantly increased my awareness of how considerably individuals susceptible to addiction or relapse may be at this time. Venniro et al. recognize a powerful protective factor against drug addiction in rats that may have similar protective factors in humans, and in doing so they predict the increased potential for individuals at risk to turn to drugs during these unprecedented times. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more