Skip to main content

Post 10

Both Buffing et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)  align very much with my current research interests: everything and anything involving the gut-brain axis. This interest was spurred by a class I have mentioned in several of my blog posts thus far: Brain, Behavior and Immunity. The knowledge that I gained from this class allowed me to have a more insightful perspective when reading these papers.
Having read a decent amount of papers about the gut-brain axis, something that particularly stood out to me in the Buffing et al. (2016)  paper was social interaction not inducing LTP in the VTA of the maternal high-fat diet offspring. I thought it was interesting that they tied social interaction to the VTA which I usually think about more with physical rewards rather than social. Something I was thinking about while reading this is what nutrients were the mice on the high-fat diet deficient in? Do we even have a way of quantifying mice as nutrient deficient? Is it the fat of the diet that is causing issues or is it the lack of other nutrients?
The article also mentions “more frequent spontaneous abortion in obese mothers” which lead me to question why this might be? Is this a result of the obese mothers having issues with their immune systems making changes to accept the DNA of the fetus (something learned in BBI) or is it more related to the body being under greater stress in general?
In the Reber et al. paper (2016), I thought it would have been interesting if they had investigated the transgenerational effects of stress and stress resilience in mice (a thought I had in relation to how the Buffering et al. paper studied maternal activity having an effect on the offspring). Would we continue to see this stress reduction across generations? These two papers were the perfect way to end our semester!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...

Sial & Allsop

Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...

Buffington and Reber

Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...