Skip to main content

Post 10: Gut-Brain Axis

By
While I am far from an expert on it, the gut-brain axis is one of the topics that is most fascinating to me in neuroscience today. Philosophers have argued for hundreds of years whether or not the body and the mind are connected, and the influence of the gut on mental health and vice versa seems to be key evidence that they are. I was excited to have the opportunity to learn more about these brain-gut interactions through Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016) this week, particularly in considering how the results of these experiments could point to treatments that are relatively easily translatable for humans.  

Due to my interest in the application of information about the gut-brain axis to human subjects, I put a lot of thought into what these papers may mean for the future of treatment and prevention of neurodevelopmental and anxiety disorders. Taking both papers into consideration, I wondered about the differences in the emergence of stress-related mental illnesses such as PTSD and neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD. Both seem to be related to the gut-brain axis—PTSD being associated with deficient immunoregulation paired with stress and ASD being associated with reduced diversity of gut microbiota—but result in different disorders. This leads me to contemplate whether the specific circumstances which led to ASD- and PTSD-like phenotypes in rodents are specific to these disorders, or whether the “old friends” hypothesis can also explain the recent increase in reported ASD cases (among other reasons) and reduced microbiota diversity also puts individuals at greater risk of developing PTSD. Further, I wonder if the absence of L. reuteriis specifically associated with ASD-like behaviors and whether the absence of other species might lead to different phenotypes. 

Buffington et al. provided compelling evidence for the role of maternal obesity and gut microbiota (maternal and offspring) in offspring neurodevelopmental deficits, providing a strong base for future studies that might bring us closer to clinical applications. I would be interested in investigating the extent to which general probiotics (perhaps including L. reuteri) mimic the ameliorative effects seen with selective reintroduction of L. reuteri, if at all. I believe it would be beneficial to conduct this experiment in both mothers (fed high-fat and normal diets) as well, giving researchers more insight into whether general diversification of maternal microbiota has a protective effect for the development of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring of obese mothers. I was also fascinated by the finding that administering MHFD offspring with oxytocin reversed their neuronal and social deficits. Given the knowledge that oxytocin production can be socially/behaviorally increased, such as through mother rats licking their offspring, I would be interested in seeing whether such maternal behaviors (or others) that increase oxytocin may have similar abilities to reverse neuronal and social deficits of MHFD offspring. It is clear that there is much more to know about the gut-brain axis, and I look forward to learning more about the topic from future research. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more