Skip to main content

Post 10: Gut-Brain Axis

By
While I am far from an expert on it, the gut-brain axis is one of the topics that is most fascinating to me in neuroscience today. Philosophers have argued for hundreds of years whether or not the body and the mind are connected, and the influence of the gut on mental health and vice versa seems to be key evidence that they are. I was excited to have the opportunity to learn more about these brain-gut interactions through Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016) this week, particularly in considering how the results of these experiments could point to treatments that are relatively easily translatable for humans.  

Due to my interest in the application of information about the gut-brain axis to human subjects, I put a lot of thought into what these papers may mean for the future of treatment and prevention of neurodevelopmental and anxiety disorders. Taking both papers into consideration, I wondered about the differences in the emergence of stress-related mental illnesses such as PTSD and neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD. Both seem to be related to the gut-brain axis—PTSD being associated with deficient immunoregulation paired with stress and ASD being associated with reduced diversity of gut microbiota—but result in different disorders. This leads me to contemplate whether the specific circumstances which led to ASD- and PTSD-like phenotypes in rodents are specific to these disorders, or whether the “old friends” hypothesis can also explain the recent increase in reported ASD cases (among other reasons) and reduced microbiota diversity also puts individuals at greater risk of developing PTSD. Further, I wonder if the absence of L. reuteriis specifically associated with ASD-like behaviors and whether the absence of other species might lead to different phenotypes. 

Buffington et al. provided compelling evidence for the role of maternal obesity and gut microbiota (maternal and offspring) in offspring neurodevelopmental deficits, providing a strong base for future studies that might bring us closer to clinical applications. I would be interested in investigating the extent to which general probiotics (perhaps including L. reuteri) mimic the ameliorative effects seen with selective reintroduction of L. reuteri, if at all. I believe it would be beneficial to conduct this experiment in both mothers (fed high-fat and normal diets) as well, giving researchers more insight into whether general diversification of maternal microbiota has a protective effect for the development of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring of obese mothers. I was also fascinated by the finding that administering MHFD offspring with oxytocin reversed their neuronal and social deficits. Given the knowledge that oxytocin production can be socially/behaviorally increased, such as through mother rats licking their offspring, I would be interested in seeing whether such maternal behaviors (or others) that increase oxytocin may have similar abilities to reverse neuronal and social deficits of MHFD offspring. It is clear that there is much more to know about the gut-brain axis, and I look forward to learning more about the topic from future research. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more