Skip to main content

Gut-Brain Interaction, Buffington & Reber

By
The Buffington and Reber papers both explored the effects of the gut microbiome on rodent behavior. Buffington et al studied how maternal high fat diets affected the social behavior of their offspring. Specifically, they identified one type of bacteria, L. reuteri, as a fundamental component of restoring normal social behaviors in mice with social deficits. Reber et al studied the bacteria, M. vaccae and how immunization with a heat-killed dose ameliorated stress responses in mice.

After reading the Reber paper, I'm skeptical of the translatability of their results. We've discussed in class that it's difficult to model anxiety as we know it in rodents, and this paper, in my opinion, highlights this point. The authors use chronic subordinate colony housing (CSC) and single housed mice in their behavior experiments. These conditions are certainly stressful for mice, but it's looking at a very narrow section of what's considered stress with only one type of bacteria. I'm also a bit confused about the authors relating their study to the "old friend" paradigm. They are only studying one bacteria, so how can they generalize that "exposure to environmental microorganisms" help mediate ways in which mice cope with stress?

The Buffington paper was much more straightforward to me, and I see a lot of potential to apply their data to humans, among other mammals who birth live offspring. Particularly, I'm impressed that the authors were able to identify oxytocin as the main peptide that L. reuteri affects, causing the rescue of social behaviors. I'm interested to know if there are dose-dependent effects of ingesting L. reuteri, especially under stressful conditions. That is, does ingesting a higher concentration of L. reuteri cause more profound effects on social interaction?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016) present quite fascinating approaches to studying the interactions or ‘axis’ between the rodent (and human) gut and brain. As the gut is a primary route for bringing things from the environment into our body, these two studies present very clear and convincing evidence for the relevance and translatable validity of their various hypotheses.   One of the most interesting conclusions to me from Buffington et al. was that co-housing three high-fat diet offspring with just one regular-diet offspring was enough to rescue their social behavior deficits and microbiome profiles. This is remarkable, and I would like to hear more about possible mechanisms for this transfer to actually occur. Although the article mentions that mice do eat each other’s feces to transfer microbiota, could there be a certain “threshold” or level of bacteria needed to observe this phenotype switch? That is, how many more high-fat diet mice could have been house...
Post a Comment
Read more