Skip to main content

deGuglielmo and Venniro

In deGuglielmo et al. (2019) the authors show how neuronal ensembles in the central amygdala predominantly express CRF and project to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Using optogenetic dissection, they demonstrate how inactivation of this pathway reduces the dependence-related escalation of alcohol drinking and abuse. The data presented in this paper are extremely robust and point to remarkable clinical implications in binge drinking disorders. I’m also curious if a similar pathway or neural circuit is activated in drug use and dependency, and furthermore if drug-alcohol interactions cause either a change or elevation in the recruitment of a CeA neuronal ensemble. I would also like to see a study conducted using female rats, and a subsequent comparison between males and females since sexual dimorphisms have been observed in alcohol consumption and modulation. Lastly, I think a cool follow-up study could include stress as a factor, to see whether that plays a role in the intensity of somatic signs of withdrawal.

Venniro et al. (2018) takes a novel approach in using operant procedures to analyze reward competition under the assumption that unpunished and timely social interaction is preferred over drug use (meth in particular). The study also reports that social interaction has the potential to prevent incubation of drug-craving behaviors. I think the behavioral methodology that the authors employed is relevant and has definitive translational benefits. It’s been a challenge in neuroscience to study drug and alcohol dependency in rodent models since researchers often use non-drug rewards such as palatable food, a reinforcement which doesn’t really apply to humans since social rewards have a larger impact on behavior. Hence, I believe the novel paradigm used in this study promotes a greater incorporation of social reward, which can have significant translational potential for human interventions of similar nature. I also appreciated the use of both male and female rats. It would be exciting to see future developments of this model in terms of exposure to stressors such as social defeat, as well as incorporating variables such as age and maternal care.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...

Gut-brain axis

This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...