Skip to main content

deGuglielmo and Venniro

By
In deGuglielmo et al. (2019) the authors show how neuronal ensembles in the central amygdala predominantly express CRF and project to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Using optogenetic dissection, they demonstrate how inactivation of this pathway reduces the dependence-related escalation of alcohol drinking and abuse. The data presented in this paper are extremely robust and point to remarkable clinical implications in binge drinking disorders. I’m also curious if a similar pathway or neural circuit is activated in drug use and dependency, and furthermore if drug-alcohol interactions cause either a change or elevation in the recruitment of a CeA neuronal ensemble. I would also like to see a study conducted using female rats, and a subsequent comparison between males and females since sexual dimorphisms have been observed in alcohol consumption and modulation. Lastly, I think a cool follow-up study could include stress as a factor, to see whether that plays a role in the intensity of somatic signs of withdrawal.

Venniro et al. (2018) takes a novel approach in using operant procedures to analyze reward competition under the assumption that unpunished and timely social interaction is preferred over drug use (meth in particular). The study also reports that social interaction has the potential to prevent incubation of drug-craving behaviors. I think the behavioral methodology that the authors employed is relevant and has definitive translational benefits. It’s been a challenge in neuroscience to study drug and alcohol dependency in rodent models since researchers often use non-drug rewards such as palatable food, a reinforcement which doesn’t really apply to humans since social rewards have a larger impact on behavior. Hence, I believe the novel paradigm used in this study promotes a greater incorporation of social reward, which can have significant translational potential for human interventions of similar nature. I also appreciated the use of both male and female rats. It would be exciting to see future developments of this model in terms of exposure to stressors such as social defeat, as well as incorporating variables such as age and maternal care.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more