Skip to main content

Blog Post 9- Venniro et al (2018) & de Guglielmo et al (2019)

By



Already from reading the title of the Venniro et al (2018) paper, I became interested in finding out how the researchers were able to exceed the effect of social interactions over drug choice in rats that were already previously exposed to drug addiction. Throughout the paper I wondered how the two different factors addiction and social interaction could be so closely compared to each other in terms of reward- as their effects are relatively dissimilar in strength. From my understanding, being addicted to drugs and simply abstaining from the drug is more complex than what appears to be presented in the paper, specifically for affected humans. The aim of most animal research is to explain behavioral findings towards a clinical application as well. Therefore, if these findings were to be applied to human drug addiction, then going out to a social event or improving one’s social stimuli should improve their drug addictive behaviors. This is not what has been seen in human drug addicts, as some affected individuals even appear to relapse again after exposure to social pressure. Therefore, the researchers do not enable a correctly established clinical application of the findings throughout their study. They did include a section in the discussion about how the presented results of rats would differ to that of humans. I would be interested in reading more about how exactly these applications could be improved through future experiments. 
The second paper by de Guglielmo et al (2019) was an extension of the topic of addiction but with a large emphasis on optogenetics. Since we discussed optogenetics a lot in the beginning of the course, it was interesting to see it again in a new context. Drug addiction has different components to it, meaning it can exist as both impulsive and compulsive states. In this paper, the researchers only appear to test the effect of CRF activity during the compulsive state of abuse, which clearly is the more severe state of the two. However, the researchers could have also compared and contrasted these findings with impulsive states as well to see how data may differ. As mentioned in my blog post last week, I was curious to learn more about tolerance and withdrawal. These findings allowed for a better understanding of the particular aspects of research. Thus, the researchers succeeded in explaining that the CRF pathway involving the Central Amygdala (CeA) and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) were essential in alcohol withdrawal in rats. However, the CRF is an essential component in the HPA-axis and thereby stress response. de Guglielmo et al did not mention this specifically, so I would appreciate more information on the effect that stress itself may have on drug addiction in future research.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more