Skip to main content

Blog 8: Venniro et al. (2018) & de Guglielmo et al. (2019)

By
Venniro et al. (2018) & de Guglielmo et al. (2019) take two complementary approaches to furthering the study and discussion of drug addiction and dependence in rodent models and potential clinical translations. Overall, I found Venniro et al. particularly intriguing for their discussion of clinical applications but also appreciated the extensive consideration of controls used to verify de Guglielmo et al.’s methodology. 

One critique I had for de Guglielmo et al. actually relates to their use of controls and how they originally induced alcohol dependence. The alcohol-dependent rats were exposed to cycling chronic intermittent alcohol vapors in operant chambers. For both dependent and non-dependent animals, they describe unaffected levels of water and saccharin intake in control and and NpHR-expressing rats. However, I think it would have been relevant for the researchers to also expose all groups to saccharin vapor and water vapor. If they are attempting to rule out the attribution of any nonspecific behavioral effects on alcohol drinking, it is certainly possible that the saccharin vapor (water vapor should likely have no effect) affects preference for saccharin and alters their intake relative to the intake of alcohol. 

As I mentioned, Venniro et al. discussed how their social-choice model could inform addiction treatments in humans. I agree with and really appreciate the concept of humans using a global frame of reference and ‘choice bundling’ when choosing a drug over a social interaction. As an aside, I have a close family member who is a recovering gambling addict, and while gambling has its own neural considerations compared to typical drug addiction, he has often expressed how thoughts of his actions negatively impacting family and friends has kept him from relapsing. As the authors say here, their thinking goes beyond the momentary presence or absence but focuses instead on longer-term effects and outcomes. 

Given this context, I am increasingly skeptical of rodent social addiction models for their translational relevance. If we will always have to give the caveat that ‘humans think about this differently’ then, frankly, is there any relevance at all? Sure, studies focused on pharmacological-based interventions are still likely to be translatable. Yet, despite my skepticism, I can acknowledge that social models like this one are very important given what we do know about the social aspects of addiction. I don't have a solid answer as to how, but neuroscience research must continue to develop these models and create relevant ways to bridge the gap between rodent and human translation in order for their conclusions to be the most effective and beneficial. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more