Skip to main content

Addiction, deGuglielmo & Venniro

By
These papers were some of my favorite that we've read, especially the Venniro paper. In the Venniro paper, the authors sought to answer the question, "Can the option of social interaction override a rats desire for drug self-administration?" In particular, Venniro et al studied addictive behaviors using methamphetamines and heroin. Venniro et al studied one circuit-specific mechanism for this behavior, much like how the deGuglielmo paper focused their work on the functionality of the CRF^CeA-BNST pathway. The question that hte deGuglielmo paper primarily answered was, "are the CRF projections in the CeA-BNST pathway responsible for the behaviors seen in alcohol use disorder?" Both papers were, in my opinion, designed quite well for studying addiction. 

 Intermittently, I run into social media posts that tout how important social interaction is for preventing drug addiction; however, the Venniro paper is the first evidence I've seen of this that is scientifically grounded (not that I looked very hard, but I am more inclined to believe it now). Venniro's results convince me just how powerful the effects of socialization are to a being's mental health. As an aspiring healthcare worker, this is definitely a paper that I'll hold close. Popping pills to treat mental disorders isn't necessarily the best route--it certainly isn't the only route. However, in humans, if treatments were as easy as saying, "just socialize, it'll help you overcome your addiction," I suspect it would've been done by now. Societal and medical stratifications aside, this study makes me wonder how social networks in groups of people can be reinforced through being a drug user. That is, does continuous use of drugs strengthen existing social relationships, leading to a cycle of drug use, social reinforcement, and addiction?

 DeGuglielmo et al show convincing data that CRF projections from the CeA to the BNST are functionally related to withdrawal and addiction behaviors in rats addicted to alcohol. My one big critique for this paper is that the behavior is done in a very controlled environment. The authors state that this CeA-BNST pathway is a potential target to treat excessive alcohol use. However, this is stated without exploring factors such as chronic and acute stress, circulating levels of hormones, or ingesting excess alcohol in addition to another addictive drug. Though I am convinced that their experiment was clean, and the functionality of the circuit in their lab rats is valid, I think addiction of any sort is too complex of an issue to narrow down to one single pathway. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more