These papers were some of my favorite that we've read, especially the Venniro paper. In the Venniro paper, the authors sought to answer the question, "Can the option of social interaction override a rats desire for drug self-administration?" In particular, Venniro et al studied addictive behaviors using methamphetamines and heroin. Venniro et al studied one circuit-specific mechanism for this behavior, much like how the deGuglielmo paper focused their work on the functionality of the CRF^CeA-BNST pathway. The question that hte deGuglielmo paper primarily answered was, "are the CRF projections in the CeA-BNST pathway responsible for the behaviors seen in alcohol use disorder?" Both papers were, in my opinion, designed quite well for studying addiction.
Intermittently, I run into social media posts that tout how important social interaction is for preventing drug addiction; however, the Venniro paper is the first evidence I've seen of this that is scientifically grounded (not that I looked very hard, but I am more inclined to believe it now). Venniro's results convince me just how powerful the effects of socialization are to a being's mental health. As an aspiring healthcare worker, this is definitely a paper that I'll hold close. Popping pills to treat mental disorders isn't necessarily the best route--it certainly isn't the only route. However, in humans, if treatments were as easy as saying, "just socialize, it'll help you overcome your addiction," I suspect it would've been done by now. Societal and medical stratifications aside, this study makes me wonder how social networks in groups of people can be reinforced through being a drug user. That is, does continuous use of drugs strengthen existing social relationships, leading to a cycle of drug use, social reinforcement, and addiction?
DeGuglielmo et al show convincing data that CRF projections from the CeA to the BNST are functionally related to withdrawal and addiction behaviors in rats addicted to alcohol. My one big critique for this paper is that the behavior is done in a very controlled environment. The authors state that this CeA-BNST pathway is a potential target to treat excessive alcohol use. However, this is stated without exploring factors such as chronic and acute stress, circulating levels of hormones, or ingesting excess alcohol in addition to another addictive drug. Though I am convinced that their experiment was clean, and the functionality of the circuit in their lab rats is valid, I think addiction of any sort is too complex of an issue to narrow down to one single pathway.
Intermittently, I run into social media posts that tout how important social interaction is for preventing drug addiction; however, the Venniro paper is the first evidence I've seen of this that is scientifically grounded (not that I looked very hard, but I am more inclined to believe it now). Venniro's results convince me just how powerful the effects of socialization are to a being's mental health. As an aspiring healthcare worker, this is definitely a paper that I'll hold close. Popping pills to treat mental disorders isn't necessarily the best route--it certainly isn't the only route. However, in humans, if treatments were as easy as saying, "just socialize, it'll help you overcome your addiction," I suspect it would've been done by now. Societal and medical stratifications aside, this study makes me wonder how social networks in groups of people can be reinforced through being a drug user. That is, does continuous use of drugs strengthen existing social relationships, leading to a cycle of drug use, social reinforcement, and addiction?
DeGuglielmo et al show convincing data that CRF projections from the CeA to the BNST are functionally related to withdrawal and addiction behaviors in rats addicted to alcohol. My one big critique for this paper is that the behavior is done in a very controlled environment. The authors state that this CeA-BNST pathway is a potential target to treat excessive alcohol use. However, this is stated without exploring factors such as chronic and acute stress, circulating levels of hormones, or ingesting excess alcohol in addition to another addictive drug. Though I am convinced that their experiment was clean, and the functionality of the circuit in their lab rats is valid, I think addiction of any sort is too complex of an issue to narrow down to one single pathway.
Comments
Post a Comment