Skip to main content

Shifting Perspectives: Implicating Microglia in the Development of Schizophrenia Pathogenesis

By


Schizophrenia is a disorder of high complexity in which many neural pathways present aberrant signaling. ­­­In fact, this is true in the symptoms that are presented as it is arguably one of the most heterogenous disorders, with symptoms ranging from hallucinations to flat affect. As changes in the dopaminergic, serotonergic, cholinergic, glutamatergic, and GABAergic systems are present, not one singular factor has been identified as the root cause. On a more macroscopic scale, structural abnormalities are seen such as decreased brain volumes and enlarged ventricles1. 
            Currently, there is no singular genetic variant or environmental factor in which the development of schizophrenia can be attributed. Rather, the prevailing understanding is that schizophrenia arises through sets of gene by environment interactions over long periods of time. Being that the pathophysiology is so heterogeneous in systems as well as across patients, this variance may be attributed to an accumulation of these interactions over a lifetime. 
            Recent research has pointed to several roles microglia play in driving this pathophysiology1–5. A more recent endeavor in understanding the basis of schizophrenia amongst other disorders, as more studies are published linking the neuroimmune function of these cells to pathology, the conversation and hypothesis surrounding these disorders is being reframed. Microglia, the resident immune macrophage-like cells in the brain oversee much of the processes that remove debris from the brain as well as prune under-active synapses4. As these cells begin their lineage in the yolk sac, they are persistent throughout neural development. Therefore, much research is being done to look at the long-term effects alterations in microglia can have in the brain when affected by genetic and environmental factors. 
            As more and more studies implicate microglia in the development of schizophrenia, this cell type should be included more conversations regarding neuropathology. It is the case that many studies rely only on neuronal genetics, physiology, and morphology where it may be helpful to bring microglial function into the conversation. Overall, the sheer utility of microglia as a cell type is changing many understandings of disorders such as schizophrenia and giving much insight into how they develop.


Works Cited 
1.         Jaaro-Peled, H., Ayhan, Y., Pletnikov, M. V. & Sawa, A. Review of Pathological Hallmarks of Schizophrenia: Comparison of Genetic Models With Patients and Nongenetic Models. Schizophr. Bull. 36, 301–313 (2010).
2.         Wang, M., Zhang, L. & Gage, F. H. Microglia, complement and schizophrenia. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 333–334 (2019).
3.         Tay, T. L. et al. Microglia Gone Rogue: Impacts on Psychiatric Disorders across the Lifespan. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 10, (2018).
4.         Nayak, D., Roth, T. L. & McGavern, D. B. Microglia Development and function. Annu. Rev. Immunol.32, 367–402 (2014).
5.         Sellgren, C. M. et al. Increased microglial synapse elimination in patient-specific models of schizophrenia. http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/231290 (2017) doi:10.1101/231290.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more