Skip to main content

Post 7 Sexual dimorphism in Rat Cocaine Responses

By
Holly et al. 2012 and Vassoler et al. present an interesting look not only into the susceptibility to drug abuse and addiction but how sexual dimorphisms may alter this behavioral response to drug administration. Holly et al. 2012 closely examines how sex and differences in hormonal levels may affect the likelihood of rats to “binge” or are more likely to develop behavioral responses to prolonged drug use when faced with social defeat stress. Interestingly, social defeat stress along did cause a heightened effect in both sexes but had a much more profound effect on the dopaminergic response to cocaine in female rats. One shortcoming is the mechanism by which estrogens may affect this heightened sensitization. In the first assay, it is clear that female estrous cycle socially stressed rats have the higher behavioral response of walk duration when administered cocaine as compared to non-estrous. But, in the second and third experiments the estrous condition is collapsed to only show females with a higher NAc dopaminergic response and binge behavior, especially in the socially stressed condition. Interestingly, this represents more motivated drug seeking in which estrogens don’t seem to have an effect. To me, it would be highly interesting to parse this out as to why these different behaviors are more or less susceptible to estrogens. For example, it would be interesting to see if there is no effect of estrogens on DA dialysis when cocaine is administered. 
            
            Vassoler et al. 2013 shows the possible protective effect of chronic paternal cocaine use in reducing male offspring susceptibility to prolonged cocaine dependency. This study is very thorough and shows clearly that higher transcription and levels of BDNF in the mPFC in males is most likely responsible for this dimorphism in chronic drug response. But an interesting consideration arises when a deeper look is taken into why there is a larger response in males only. The genetic inheritance should be similar for both sexes (except for sex-linked genes). It would be interesting to see if somehow the early estradiol in brain development of males interacts with a known inherited gene changed by chronic cocaine use. This question could definitely be answered through means of sequencing sal vs coc sired groups. Overall, it is very interesting to see how there are generational protective mechanisms for males but possibly not female rats. In a larger scope, these sexual dimorphisms in drug response and addiction risk would always be interesting to view at a human translational level. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more