Skip to main content

Post 7: Cocaine and Rats

By
            I have always thought that if one of your parents was an addict, that you were more likely to become one as well. I’m not sure if that preconceived notion was based in something scientific that I had read or if I just heard it somewhere, but I’m really happy that the Vassoler paper addressed it in the discussion. Apparently, there are data that show that cocaine addiction is heritable. Since this conflicted with their conclusion, the authors then went on to say that there are so many other aspects of addiction that could contribute to this data we see in humans. Since both genetics and environment come into play, I would really like to see them do an experiment in which they also alter the environment. I’d be curious to see if they raised the F1 generation of both cocaine sired rats and saline sired rats in a neutral environment, an enriched environment, and a negative environment. I wonder if being raised in a negative environment, with chronic stress for example, will reverse the reduced cocaine intake for cocaine sired rats. If there is an effect in this generation, do their BDNF levels also change? Is there perhaps a critical period in which this susceptibility to reduce cocaine intake can change? In regards to the Holly paper, I was surprised that females had a longer “binge” period and were more vulnerable to cocaine addiction following social defeat. I’d be really curious to see if this vulnerability also applied to chronic stress, without any social aspect. I also wonder if it’s possible to put rats on birth control. Since the estrous cycle had significant effects, I’m curious as to if artificially altering it will affect the data. I know that a lot of women take different forms of birth control and don’t get their periods. While I don’t know what exactly happens with the hormones, I’d still be curious as to if these females responded more like the males.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more