I have always thought that if one of your parents was an addict, that you were more likely to become one as well. I’m not sure if that preconceived notion was based in something scientific that I had read or if I just heard it somewhere, but I’m really happy that the Vassoler paper addressed it in the discussion. Apparently, there are data that show that cocaine addiction is heritable. Since this conflicted with their conclusion, the authors then went on to say that there are so many other aspects of addiction that could contribute to this data we see in humans. Since both genetics and environment come into play, I would really like to see them do an experiment in which they also alter the environment. I’d be curious to see if they raised the F1 generation of both cocaine sired rats and saline sired rats in a neutral environment, an enriched environment, and a negative environment. I wonder if being raised in a negative environment, with chronic stress for example, will reverse the reduced cocaine intake for cocaine sired rats. If there is an effect in this generation, do their BDNF levels also change? Is there perhaps a critical period in which this susceptibility to reduce cocaine intake can change? In regards to the Holly paper, I was surprised that females had a longer “binge” period and were more vulnerable to cocaine addiction following social defeat. I’d be really curious to see if this vulnerability also applied to chronic stress, without any social aspect. I also wonder if it’s possible to put rats on birth control. Since the estrous cycle had significant effects, I’m curious as to if artificially altering it will affect the data. I know that a lot of women take different forms of birth control and don’t get their periods. While I don’t know what exactly happens with the hormones, I’d still be curious as to if these females responded more like the males.
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice. The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Comments
Post a Comment