Skip to main content

Post 6

By
My initials thoughts when reading Ayhan et al. 2011 is that modelling schizophrenia based on a single gene mutation seemed like an oversimplification of a complex disorder. However, I do realize how difficult it is to even attempt to model this disorder. I thought it was really interesting to see that the gene expression has to happen at particular critical periods in order to cause changes in behavior.  This is something we have been talking about a lot in the class Brain, Behavior, and Immunity (BBI). Something else we have been talking about a lot in BBI is that these critical periods are usually very different in females and males. This paper used both females and males and there are differences in behaviors between genders with the forced swim test (FST) and tail suspension task (TST) but the paper never offers a thorough explanation as to what they might think this means. I would have like their thoughts on the differences in critical period between females and males with schizophrenia for this gene.

The second paper, Burrows et al. 2015, was my favorite of the two and takes a very different approach to modelling schizophrenia. I was actually unaware that environmental factors needed to be taken into consideration with schizophrenia; I was under the misconception that it is a purely genetic disease. I had seen the environmental enrichment (EE) paradigm used in studies of depression but to see it implemented in this context was very cool.  I was a little confused as to why this paper did not also use an environment derived paradigm (small cage without standard bedding maybe?) as additional comparison for the differences between the knockouts, as I feel like this would have provided even more support to idea that EE is responsible for altering behavioral impairments.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more