Skip to main content

Post 6: Genetic and environmental effects on mouse models of Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is an extremely complex disorder that, like most other psychological disorders, can be impacted by numerous genetic and environmental factors before and after birth. Ayhan et al. and Burrows et al. both explore some of these factors and how they affect neuronal morphology, behavior, and biochemistry in mouse models of schizophrenia. I was excited to see that both papers utilized both male and female disease models, but I was somewhat surprised by the lack of sex effects reported by Burrows, especially given the differential timeline and manifestations of schizophrenia in men and women. I imagine that the lack of sex effects in Burrows, as compared to significant sex effects in Ayhan, may be due to the fact that different genes/proteins with different functions are being manipulated and those manipulations are occurring in different ways. Perhaps the fact that DISC1 is scaffold protein that has a wide range of proteins it binds to accounts, in part, for the presentation of sex differences not seen with mGlu5. Ayhan did report different results between sexes in behavior, monoamine content, and responses to drugs, but did not find any underlying differences in brain morphology or monoamine levels. It seems that further research could be conducted to identify possible sources of differentiation between males and females. I found it especially interesting that some of the behavioral results seem to reflect those seen in humans (females showing more depression-like behaviors and males showing more aggressive behaviors) and would be interested in further exploration to see if this apparent similarity is significant. 

While reading these papers, I also became interested in the importance of temporal precision of the methods in both papers. In Ayhan, the Tet-off system is used with Dox-containing food to temporally control expression of hDISC1 in pre- and post-natal mice. Because so many aspects of development are time-dependent, I wonder how precise this method can be prenatally, and whether results for the prenatal group would differ if Dox was delivered at a different embryonic timepoint. As for Burrows, I am very curious about how changing the timing of environmental enrichment might influence its efficacy in modulating schizophrenia-like impairments. Perhaps earlier postnatal environmental enrichment could further improve schizophrenia-like effects in mGlu5 KO animals. Additionally, I wonder if environmental enrichment of a pregnant mouse could improve the outcome of her offspring, leading to an improved prenatal environment—which can be an important factor contributing to schizophrenia risk. Having a greater understanding of internal and external factors related to schizophrenia during adulthood as well as development is crucial to understanding and decreasing risk of disease. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...

Gut-brain axis

This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...