Skip to main content

Modeling Schizophrenia: Ayhan et al. and Burrows et al.

By
Both of these papers aimed to model schizophrenia in mice models, albeit by very different avenues. The first paper, published in 2011 by Ayhan et al., investigated the role of mutant human DISC1 gene in neurobehavioral abnormalities associated with the disorder by examining the effect of the mutant hDISC1 expression at different timepoints of development. Across these developmental stages of mutant expression, the researchers tested social interaction, depressive-like behaviors, and drug-induced activity. 
I very much appreciated that this paper used both male and female mouse models (which is surprising for a 2011 paper, I think). However, for multiple behavioral tests, the groups of male and female mice exhibited different behaviors, and for some reason this was not addressed in the paper. Specifically, female mice in the “post” group spent more time in immobility compared to the female mice in the “no” group, but “expression of mutant hDISC1 had no effect on these behaviors in male mice of either group.” Also, the male mice in the “pre + post” group exhibited an increase in locomotion with injections of MK-801 and d-amphetamine, but there was no difference among the groups of female mice. Is this not significant? Perhaps I am missing something here, but I would expect an explanation, at the very least, for why the results were different for the male and female mice. Moreover, I found the data from the frontal cortex of the male mice (specifically the decrease in tissue content of DA and DOPAC in the experimental groups when compared to the control) very convincing, but what about the frontal cortex in females? I could not even find this in supplementary. All in all, I did find the data in this paper compelling, but I would have liked an explanation for why the behavioral effects of the mutation were not consistent across the male and female mice.
The second paper, published in 2015 by Burrows et al., used an mGlu5r deficient-model to investigate the interactions between genes and the environment in the context of the development of a schizophrenia phenotype. I believe that this is a very important aspect of all neurological disorders that must be addressed; however, I was shocked to find that their study used only male mice. I feel that it would have been interesting to assess the differential effects of environmental enrichment on male and female mice – can’t we agree that there is possibly a difference in the way that genetics in males and females are modulated by the environment? I would have been much more convinced if this had been addressed in the paper. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more