Skip to main content

Holly et al. (2012) and Vassoler et al. (2013)

By
The first of the two papers, Holly et al. (2012), is an interesting look into the effects of stress at different stages in the estrogen cycle on behavioral and neural sensitization as well as self-administration of cocaine. Although the paper was compelling, it left me with a lot of questions. Why in Figure 2 is their increased walk duration with cocaine administration in the non-stressed females-estrus? I feel like the authors just kind of moved passed this and never addressed it. Additionally, the entire paper I could not stop thinking about how maybe this study could lead to an additional study looking into immune responses linked to stress and how that might vary in different stages of the estrogen cycle and effect behavioral and neural sensitization as well self-administration of cocaine, as I learned in Brain, Behavior, and Immunity that there are studies that show how immune responses can impact addiction. A final thought I had with this paper is if be defeated by a lactating dam is really the same as being defeated by male? There article stated that there was no difference in latency to the first bite, total number of bites received, or duration of defeat encounter was observed  but does it cause the animal a different kind of stress and maybe to have a different physical reaction?
The second of the two papers,Vassoler et al. (2013), I enjoyed a little more because I felt it was more straightforward in what it was attempting to accomplish, establishing that paternal cocaine ingestion can alter gene expression of the male offspring. In the first paper it mentioned that in 2010, 35.9% of cocaine users in the USA were female. That means the majority of users were male. This second paper almost seems to offer an explanation for this human behavior, making it more translational in my opinion than the first. Overall, these two papers were enjoyable read and provide a good insight into cocaine addiction.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016) present quite fascinating approaches to studying the interactions or ‘axis’ between the rodent (and human) gut and brain. As the gut is a primary route for bringing things from the environment into our body, these two studies present very clear and convincing evidence for the relevance and translatable validity of their various hypotheses.   One of the most interesting conclusions to me from Buffington et al. was that co-housing three high-fat diet offspring with just one regular-diet offspring was enough to rescue their social behavior deficits and microbiome profiles. This is remarkable, and I would like to hear more about possible mechanisms for this transfer to actually occur. Although the article mentions that mice do eat each other’s feces to transfer microbiota, could there be a certain “threshold” or level of bacteria needed to observe this phenotype switch? That is, how many more high-fat diet mice could have been house...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more