Skip to main content

Holly et al. (2012) and Vassoler et al. (2013)

By
The first of the two papers, Holly et al. (2012), is an interesting look into the effects of stress at different stages in the estrogen cycle on behavioral and neural sensitization as well as self-administration of cocaine. Although the paper was compelling, it left me with a lot of questions. Why in Figure 2 is their increased walk duration with cocaine administration in the non-stressed females-estrus? I feel like the authors just kind of moved passed this and never addressed it. Additionally, the entire paper I could not stop thinking about how maybe this study could lead to an additional study looking into immune responses linked to stress and how that might vary in different stages of the estrogen cycle and effect behavioral and neural sensitization as well self-administration of cocaine, as I learned in Brain, Behavior, and Immunity that there are studies that show how immune responses can impact addiction. A final thought I had with this paper is if be defeated by a lactating dam is really the same as being defeated by male? There article stated that there was no difference in latency to the first bite, total number of bites received, or duration of defeat encounter was observed  but does it cause the animal a different kind of stress and maybe to have a different physical reaction?
The second of the two papers,Vassoler et al. (2013), I enjoyed a little more because I felt it was more straightforward in what it was attempting to accomplish, establishing that paternal cocaine ingestion can alter gene expression of the male offspring. In the first paper it mentioned that in 2010, 35.9% of cocaine users in the USA were female. That means the majority of users were male. This second paper almost seems to offer an explanation for this human behavior, making it more translational in my opinion than the first. Overall, these two papers were enjoyable read and provide a good insight into cocaine addiction.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more