Skip to main content

Final paper proposal and sources

By
For my final paper, I am interested in researching addiction behavior and specifically how well the paradigm of sign-tracking versus goal-tracking behavior models addiction. Of course, addiction is an extremely complex and multifaceted disorder to study and understand. With this in mind, I am aiming to isolate this specific behavior paradigm and evaluate 1) differences in how it is performed in animals, 2) the similarities or dissimilarities between conclusions across various studies as to what the paradigm represents and 3) its construct validity in modeling and/or predicting addiction behavior between animals and humans. 

The task in [1] involved a lever being pressed for food delivery. Sign-trackers primarily approached and contacted the lever (the input) while goal-trackers preferentially approached the site of food delivery (the output). When later trained on a choice task between receiving food or an infusion of cocaine, sign-trackers chose cocaine over food significantly more often. Their research question asked whether the tendency to sign-track to a food cue was predictive of rats’ choice of cocaine over food. 

A primary conclusion of [2] was that sign-tracking and goal-tracking behavior may be due to different structures and pathways in the brain which can lead to differences in the manifestation of addiction behavior. This study used a reward devaluation procedure (i.e. the reward was paired with illness in the absence of the conditioned stimulus) and examined whether sign- and goal-tracking behavior increased or decreased. 

[3] is a review article that covers a wide range of material that could be useful for finding other sources in the coming weeks. It also focuses on how sign-tracking influences gambling addiction, which was the original disorder that interested me in wanting to research this topic. One main conclusion the review suggests is that sign-tracking animals are especially vulnerable to addiction due to the attribution of incentive salience to drug cues. 

[4] is another review article that I find very relevant for how it bridges this research between animal models and human behavior. Along with the previous source, it is an extremely new paper and could be interesting to compare to older studies. Overall, the article looks at attributes of sign- and goal-tracking animal profiles with an emphasis on neurobiological and behavioral profiles that have the greatest relevance to human behaviors. 

[5] builds upon the concepts of source [2] in saying that sign-tracking and goal-tracking are governed by distinct neurochemical mechanisms. Their hypothesis was whether the use of distinct conditioned stimuli could have different neurochemical responses (i.e. recruit different dopamine receptor subtypes) that lead mice to develop one behavior type over the other. They show that the selective involvement of D2 activity in sign-tracking may reflect its importance in motivational processes while D1 is involved in both sign- and goal-tracking, reflecting its general role in learning associations. 

[1] Tunstall, B., & Kearns, D. (2015). Sign-tracking predicts increased choice of cocaine over food in rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 281(5), 222-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.034

[2] Morrison, S., Bamkole, M., & Nicola, S. (2015). Sign Tracking, but Not Goal Tracking, is Resistant to Outcome Devaluation. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00468

[3] Anselme, P., & Robinson, M. (2020). From sign-tracking to attentional bias: Implications for gambling and substance use disorders. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 99, 109861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109861

[4] Colaizzi, J., Flagel, S., Joyner, M., Gearhardt, A., Stewart, J., & Paulus, M. (2020). Mapping sign-tracking and goal-tracking onto human behaviors. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 111, 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.018

[5] Roughley, S., & Killcross, S. (2019). Differential involvement of dopamine receptor subtypes in the acquisition of Pavlovian sign-tracking and goal-tracking responses. Psychopharmacology, 236(6), 1853-1862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-5169-8

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more