Skip to main content

Examining the Sex Differences in Cocaine Addiction in Rats

By
Both of these papers aimed to examine the sexual dimorphisms that contribute to cocaine addiction susceptibility, either through the lens of social defeat stress or paternal cocaine use. The first paper, published by Holly et al. in 2012, not only examined the differences between male and female rats, but also addressed the variation within the female group as a result of the estrous cycle. One aspect of this paper that I found particularly interesting was the difference in increase in dopamine in the NAc from baseline across the male and female groups. The data showed that while there was a greater increase in local dopamine in the stressed groups of both sexes, the dopamine levels returned to baseline within 60 minutes in the male group, but stayed elevated for much longer in the female (35-45 minutes longer than in the males). I found this data very compelling, but it did lead me to wonder what developmental steps are at play that would make female rats more susceptible to this prolonged dopamine increase. Do sexual dimorphisms cause this prolonged dopamine release, or does the heightened dopamine response to cocaine cause circuit changes or plasticity that feeds back to perpetuate a more robust addiction pathway? 

The second paper, by Vassoler et al., examined the epigenetic inheritance of a cocaine-resistant phenotype, particularly in male rats with paternal cocaine exposure (“cocaine-sired males”). The data from this paper suggests that increased BDNF in the mPFC of cocaine-sired males contributes to a cocaine-resistant phenotype, which was not seen in the female rats. This led me to wonder what other factors contribute to the lack of resistance in the female rats, and it would have been interesting to see the methods from the first paper employed in this study. Firstly, I think it would have been interesting to see if there were differences in estrus cocaine-sired females versus met/diestrus cocaine-sired females, because it makes sense to me, based on the first paper, that estrus females would be more susceptible than diestrus females. Also, conducting a similar dialysis experiment to examine the levels of dopamine in the cocaine-sired females could be an exciting direction to take (as heightened levels would explain the higher cocaine self-administration in female rats). Overall, I found both of these papers interesting and highly relevant to a wholistic understanding of the neural mechanisms that underly cocaine addiction. 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more