Skip to main content

Burrows et al & Ayah et al.


This weeks papers were particularly interesting to me as I have family affected with this disorder and have always been intrigued by the genes that give rise to the particular symptoms associated with Schizophrenia. I started learning about gene by environment interactions in my behavioral genetics class and therefore was excited to see that was the major focus of the paper by Burrows et al. I thought about their approach to testing this and found the idea of environmental enrichment to be quite fitting as the incidence of schizophrenia in human populations is different across the globe (such as a higher incidence rate in North America, Canada and Australia). These differences in environment (climate, levels of poverty and healthcare access and childhood development) can lead to alterations in gene transcriptions leaving people with more susceptible biology prone to developing disorders such as schizophrenia. The absence of mGlu5 and introduction of changes in the environment brought on interesting behavioral and morphological changes and Burrows et al. likened it to pharmacological intervention. This was a big statement to make in terms of schizophrenia research and may hold some validity and transferability to humans as well.

With the development of tools such as genetic testing (23 & me, etc.) it could be possible to screen children at a young age for more predisposed genes and regulate their developing environment and increasing activities such as healthy eating and exercise, as well as increasing access to healthcare, to diminish the possibility of the onset of this disease. This is where Y Ayhan et al. come into play as their study shows that some specific genes associated with schizophrenia play important roles during different critical periods of development by looking at behavioral and morphological changes as a result of different onset periods of a mutant hDISC1 gene. It goes to show how intricate the development of an organism is given that gene expression not only has to occur, but has to occur within a specific time period of development. Having used genetic screening, the disrupted DISC1 gene was found in a Scottish family which brings us back full circle to the idea that people can be screened early to identify genes and and employ methods such as: environmental enrichment and, once fully clinically diagnosed, pharmacological treatment to help people prone or already diagnosed with this disorder or other mood disorders.

I am particularly driven by the work done by Burrows et al. as my great aunt grew up in an impoverished area of Sri Lanka and the time and place during which she grew up may not have been as fortunate with a high standard of living and the lack of a proper upbringing along with the lack of early intervention has lead her to the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Since then however, pharmacological treatment has proven to be very helpful for her. This idea can also be carried forward into the homeless population and why homeless people are generally seen to have mood disorders or similar behaviors. As their standard of living starts to decline, their body needs to rapidly adapt to the changes in their diet and habits along with the harsh conditions homeless people endure. All the work done by Burrows et al. and Y Ahyan et al. are proving to move the research in the right direction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...