Skip to main content

Blog 7: Holly et al. (2012) and Vassoler et al. (2013)

By
Holly et al. (2012) and Vassoler et al. (2013) were both fairly straightforward reads and discussed two aspects of sex differences in the development of cocaine addiction in rodents. The former focused on the effects of social defeat stress while the latter was concerned with paternal epigenetic inheritance of a cocaine-resistance phenotype. 

One question I had for both articles concerned their use of ketamine as an anesthetic drug. It caught my attention in the methods as it was recently discussed in another course of mine for its role as an antidepressant. Briefly, we know ketamine is an NMDA receptor antagonist which preferentially binds to receptors on GABA neurons. It is also known that clinical depression and addiction are highly co-morbid and have circuitry involving many overlapping regions, such as the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex as studied here. Unsurprisingly, GABA inhibition via ketamine could increase glutamate release from excitatory neurons and theoretically impact levels of related neurotransmitters. Therefore, is it possible that the administered ketamine could impact the measured levels of dopamine from baseline? In Holly et al., ketamine was notably dosed 10x higher than the acute cocaine. Although there was no measured difference in average dopamine concentration, can it be assumed that the measurements were collected after the ketamine anesthetic was given? This may be an easily dismissible concern, but seemed relevant enough to me given the related circuitry. 

The same experiment in Holly et al. raised another question regarding the sex differences in the temporal distribution of dopaminergic sensitization after cocaine administration. Stressed females had an earlier increase of extracellular dopamine which remained elevated for a longer period of time compared to the males and the non-stressed females. The authors offer that it is most likely due to episodic stress modifying the re-uptake mechanisms for dopamine - but why does this affect females so strikingly? I think estradiol might play a role and it would have been interesting to see a side-by-side comparison between estradiol levels in all animals at the different timepoints after cocaine was given.

Overall, I appreciated both articles for furthering addiction research (an important disorder to me on a personal level) and especially for their consideration of both sexes in doing so. Of course, given that sex is particularly influential in developing risk for drug abuse in humans, it will be fascinating to see this type of research continue and hopefully expand into clinical applications.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016) present quite fascinating approaches to studying the interactions or ‘axis’ between the rodent (and human) gut and brain. As the gut is a primary route for bringing things from the environment into our body, these two studies present very clear and convincing evidence for the relevance and translatable validity of their various hypotheses.   One of the most interesting conclusions to me from Buffington et al. was that co-housing three high-fat diet offspring with just one regular-diet offspring was enough to rescue their social behavior deficits and microbiome profiles. This is remarkable, and I would like to hear more about possible mechanisms for this transfer to actually occur. Although the article mentions that mice do eat each other’s feces to transfer microbiota, could there be a certain “threshold” or level of bacteria needed to observe this phenotype switch? That is, how many more high-fat diet mice could have been house...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more