Skip to main content

Blog 7: Holly et al. (2012) and Vassoler et al. (2013)

By
Holly et al. (2012) and Vassoler et al. (2013) were both fairly straightforward reads and discussed two aspects of sex differences in the development of cocaine addiction in rodents. The former focused on the effects of social defeat stress while the latter was concerned with paternal epigenetic inheritance of a cocaine-resistance phenotype. 

One question I had for both articles concerned their use of ketamine as an anesthetic drug. It caught my attention in the methods as it was recently discussed in another course of mine for its role as an antidepressant. Briefly, we know ketamine is an NMDA receptor antagonist which preferentially binds to receptors on GABA neurons. It is also known that clinical depression and addiction are highly co-morbid and have circuitry involving many overlapping regions, such as the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex as studied here. Unsurprisingly, GABA inhibition via ketamine could increase glutamate release from excitatory neurons and theoretically impact levels of related neurotransmitters. Therefore, is it possible that the administered ketamine could impact the measured levels of dopamine from baseline? In Holly et al., ketamine was notably dosed 10x higher than the acute cocaine. Although there was no measured difference in average dopamine concentration, can it be assumed that the measurements were collected after the ketamine anesthetic was given? This may be an easily dismissible concern, but seemed relevant enough to me given the related circuitry. 

The same experiment in Holly et al. raised another question regarding the sex differences in the temporal distribution of dopaminergic sensitization after cocaine administration. Stressed females had an earlier increase of extracellular dopamine which remained elevated for a longer period of time compared to the males and the non-stressed females. The authors offer that it is most likely due to episodic stress modifying the re-uptake mechanisms for dopamine - but why does this affect females so strikingly? I think estradiol might play a role and it would have been interesting to see a side-by-side comparison between estradiol levels in all animals at the different timepoints after cocaine was given.

Overall, I appreciated both articles for furthering addiction research (an important disorder to me on a personal level) and especially for their consideration of both sexes in doing so. Of course, given that sex is particularly influential in developing risk for drug abuse in humans, it will be fascinating to see this type of research continue and hopefully expand into clinical applications.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more