Skip to main content

Blog 6: Ayhan et al (2011) and Burrows et al (2015)

Ayhan et al (2011) and Burrows et al (2015) examine different aspects of behavioral phenotypes typically seen in schizophrenia using transgenic and knockout mice models. Ayhan et al was an interesting read in terms of the gender-specific (and sometimes gender-non-specific) effects that were found throughout the experiment. For example, the noted effects of hDISC1 on immobility in the FST and TST were only significant in females while the effects of MK-801 and amphetamine (i.e. greater total locomotor activity) were only significant in males. I would have liked to see a comprehensive comparison and delineation of this gender-based data much like Table 1 to round out the article. This could be especially helpful for future experiments that examine the specifics of the temporal onset of schizophrenia, since it is widely known that human females generally display symptoms roughly 3-5 years later than males. To the authors’ credit, they acknowledge in the discussion that further experiments are certainly needed to look at gender differences in more detail, despite the data appearing to show gender associations between DISC1 and cognitive functions and disease frequency. 

For Burrows et al (2015), the primary question I had from their setup was the significance of using prepulse inhibition (PPI) and showing that environmental enrichment ameliorated the effects of it in the mGlu5 knockout group. My best attempt at understanding was that PPI involves delivering a ‘quieter’ stimulus before a startle pulse and the authors expected to induce an increased startle response in the animals injected with MK-801 compared to saline. However, how does the setup of the pulse trials and especially the variable intervals at which they were delivered fit into its function and purpose? The discussion briefly mentions how this finding could draw a parallel between the therapeutic effects of an enriched environment and pharmacological treatment. I can see where this comparison comes from in the data of Figure 5a, but I am still not fully grasping how PPI itself could be translated to a clinical model. Although a more comprehensive understanding of that protocol would give me a greater sense of confidence in this treatment recommendation, I still appreciate how the paper highlights a mix of genetic and environmental effects on schizophrenia to ensure that both are recognized as contributors to the development of this complex disorder. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...

Gut-brain axis

This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016) present quite fascinating approaches to studying the interactions or ‘axis’ between the rodent (and human) gut and brain. As the gut is a primary route for bringing things from the environment into our body, these two studies present very clear and convincing evidence for the relevance and translatable validity of their various hypotheses.   One of the most interesting conclusions to me from Buffington et al. was that co-housing three high-fat diet offspring with just one regular-diet offspring was enough to rescue their social behavior deficits and microbiome profiles. This is remarkable, and I would like to hear more about possible mechanisms for this transfer to actually occur. Although the article mentions that mice do eat each other’s feces to transfer microbiota, could there be a certain “threshold” or level of bacteria needed to observe this phenotype switch? That is, how many more high-fat diet mice could have been house...