Skip to main content

Behavioral Sex Differences, Holly & Vassoler

By
Studying sex differences in response to the same stimuli is a particularly interesting topic to me. In the case of the Holly and Vassoler papers, the stimulus is cocaine. Holly et al report that cocaine binges in response to social defeat stress causes female rats to "binge" cocaine significantly more than stressed males. Also, they reported that stressed females, but not males, saw a prolonged increase of extracellular dopamine in the Nucleus Accumbens. Vassoler et al report that ingesting cocaine can have trans-generational effects on the behavior of male cocaine-users' offspring, but not female. 

 Teasing apart the differences between the effects of cocaine in males and females is challenging. I think the most important thing that we can take away from the Holly and Vassoler papers is that cocaine certainly has differential effects on both sexes, both directly and trans-generationally. However, to what degree those effects are seen can vary widely depending on the organism and its environment. Are effects only seen in male offspring because the gene for "cocaine resistance" is on the Y-chromosome? The Vassoler paper mentions that progesterone has an opposing role to the effects of cocaine; could exogenous progesterone infusions prevent epigenetic changes in offspring? Further, could inhibiting progesterone in female rats who are given cocaine cause similar effects in their offspring as what's seen in the CocSired male offspring? 

 Both papers show great insight into what effects cocaine have at a molecular level in the brain. Ideally, I would like to see one big study combining the methods of both papers with large cohorts of animals to see the results of every possible combination, such as the trans-generational effects of cocaine addiction under stressful conditions and the levels of dopamine in CocSired offspring. Overall, I really enjoyed reading these papers and look forward to discussing them further. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016) present quite fascinating approaches to studying the interactions or ‘axis’ between the rodent (and human) gut and brain. As the gut is a primary route for bringing things from the environment into our body, these two studies present very clear and convincing evidence for the relevance and translatable validity of their various hypotheses.   One of the most interesting conclusions to me from Buffington et al. was that co-housing three high-fat diet offspring with just one regular-diet offspring was enough to rescue their social behavior deficits and microbiome profiles. This is remarkable, and I would like to hear more about possible mechanisms for this transfer to actually occur. Although the article mentions that mice do eat each other’s feces to transfer microbiota, could there be a certain “threshold” or level of bacteria needed to observe this phenotype switch? That is, how many more high-fat diet mice could have been house...
Post a Comment
Read more