Skip to main content

Behavioral Sex Differences, Holly & Vassoler

By
Studying sex differences in response to the same stimuli is a particularly interesting topic to me. In the case of the Holly and Vassoler papers, the stimulus is cocaine. Holly et al report that cocaine binges in response to social defeat stress causes female rats to "binge" cocaine significantly more than stressed males. Also, they reported that stressed females, but not males, saw a prolonged increase of extracellular dopamine in the Nucleus Accumbens. Vassoler et al report that ingesting cocaine can have trans-generational effects on the behavior of male cocaine-users' offspring, but not female. 

 Teasing apart the differences between the effects of cocaine in males and females is challenging. I think the most important thing that we can take away from the Holly and Vassoler papers is that cocaine certainly has differential effects on both sexes, both directly and trans-generationally. However, to what degree those effects are seen can vary widely depending on the organism and its environment. Are effects only seen in male offspring because the gene for "cocaine resistance" is on the Y-chromosome? The Vassoler paper mentions that progesterone has an opposing role to the effects of cocaine; could exogenous progesterone infusions prevent epigenetic changes in offspring? Further, could inhibiting progesterone in female rats who are given cocaine cause similar effects in their offspring as what's seen in the CocSired male offspring? 

 Both papers show great insight into what effects cocaine have at a molecular level in the brain. Ideally, I would like to see one big study combining the methods of both papers with large cohorts of animals to see the results of every possible combination, such as the trans-generational effects of cocaine addiction under stressful conditions and the levels of dopamine in CocSired offspring. Overall, I really enjoyed reading these papers and look forward to discussing them further. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more