Skip to main content

Behavioral Models of Dysfunction in Schizophrenia & Critical Periods of Gene x Environment Interactions

Both Burrows et al. 2015 and Ayhan et al. 2010 aim to implicate genetic factors underlying the symptoms of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia in itself is a highly complex disorder in which many of the positive symptoms are psychotic and hallucinogenic. Although there are some known biological signatures of schizophrenia translated to mouse models, the behavioral aspect remains a challenge in the field as these symptoms are especially hard to translate if at all. This being said, these papers interestingly use different methods to model schizophrenia.
            Ayhan et al. 2010 shows convincing evidence that mutant human DISC1 can cause structural, behavioral, and neurochemical abnormalities, all of which most likely interact with each other. Their behavioral data measured sociability, aggressiveness, stress response, and locomotion. Burrows et al. 2015 investigates the gene and environmental interactions that contribute to schizophrenia related phenotypes in the context of mGlu5r deficiency. This study relies on learning and locomotion as a behavioral phenotype. All of these behaviors, if abnormal, could fall under the symptomology of schizophrenia but are not necessarily discrete to the disorder. Of course, there are no methods to truly test the core symptoms of schizophrenia but, these correlates show clear dysfunction. Considering the breadth of schizophrenia research done, it is disappointing to see that studies rely on the simple and traditional behavioral assays to show dysfunction when the disorder itself is complex in nature. 
Latly, it is interesting that Ayhan et al. describes critical periods in which these genetic factors have a more profound effect on development. If these stages were to be better translated to human development, this leads to an interesting window of opportunity to intervene or simply understand what predispositions may even be interacting with the environment to create such neurobiological deficits. Maybe it is possible that the dependence on hDISC1 can be modulated by the environment. Therefore, environmental enrichment and postnatal expression might provide interesting insights. It also might be interesting to preform similar developmental tet-dependent experiments in mGlu5r deficient mice to see if this receptor is more critical at one point than another. Certainly, during PFC development, glutamatergic control is relied on to begin to correctly assess salience and limit over-excitation. Two processes in which are most likely awry in schizophrenia. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...