Skip to main content

Week 6: Modeling Schizophrenia

By
Ayhan et al and Burrows et al made me consider runaway excitation in a non-seizure disorder setting. In the last lab I worked in, we worked exclusively with Interneurons, but specifically seizures disorders that result from dysfunctional sodium channels in PV+ interneurons. This haploinsufficiency would result in epilepsy. In the lab we often talked about the implications our research could have on other mental disorders like schizophrenia. I’d be curious to utilize the Ayhan animal tet-off system in combination with studying the electrophysiological properties of interneurons. While they were able to show a decrease in the amount of PV+ cells in the cortex, I’d be curious to see how the function of the neurons changes at various developmental stages with exposure to hDISC1. In this model, it could be possible that function is not altered in this system or what few PV cells remain could also be insufficient to inhibits the proper cells and lead to runaway excitation that leads to hyperactivity and hallucinations. The Burrows paper focused more so on the effect of EE in an animal lacking mGlu5 and considering the role of NMDARs in schizophrenia. Given that there is a school of thought that interneurons facilitate synaptic remodeling and other plastic changes in cells in fear learning circuits, I’m wondering if the plasticity in a normal WT mouse is modulated by these interneurons and in a schizophrenic model the deficiency of interneurons results in “improper” plastic regulation. Similar to what Beth Stevens lab found with the role of glial cells in the synaptic pruning process in schizophrenia, it could be possible that interneurons also play a role in plastic changes in cells and in a model where these cells are defective or insufficient, then it could be a possible link to certain behavioral stereotypes seen in this disorder. I’d be really interested to utilize these mouse models while manipulating interneurons activity to see if there could be any sort of behavioral rescue or varied changes in neuronal morphology. Working with a strong focus on interneurons has constantly made me consider the role microcircuits play in behavior and the active role inhibition can play in modulation Glutamatergic activity.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more