Skip to main content

Ayhan et al. 2011 and Burrows et al. 2015

By
The 2011 paper by Ayhan and colleagues used mice models to examine the effect of DISC1 expression during different neurodevelopmental periods on behavioral and mood disorders. Specifically, Ayhan et al. were interested in evaluating components of the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia.

On the other hand, the research by Burrows and colleagues (2015) relied on the glutamatergic hypothesis of schizophrenia to evaluate the role that environmental enrichment has on behaviors while manipulating metabotropic glutamate receptors. This paper had a lot going on, so it was tricky to follow their train of thought. I think this paper strived to make a connection between clinical interventions for schizophrenia and the molecular biology that impacts how a treatment works (or doesn't work). My knowledge of metabotropic receptors, particularly NMDA receptors, is mostly centered around LTP and learning/memory. I don't think any of my classes have really covered the role these receptors play in psychiatric disease, but it makes sense to me that glutamate, which is generally excitatory, could play a role in a hyperactive, hyper locomotive disorder like schizophrenia. Although difficult to follow and often questionable, I thought this paper did a really good job highlighting the need to understand epigenetic effects to truly understand and treat mental illnesses, which are not necessarily controlled by one gene being completely "on" or "off".

The results of the Ayhan paper were more interesting to me—that postnatal Disc1 expression resulted in behavioral and psychiatric dysfunction (schizophrenia-like behaviors in males; depressive-like behaviors in females). After reading the Burrows paper, I went back and re-read the conclusions from the Ayhan paper because I started to think about combining the two seemingly-opposing hypotheses of schizophrenia. Is there some reason why schizophrenia couldn't be controlled by both neurodevelopment and glutamatergic signalling? With our understanding of psychiatric disorders, it seems pretty clear that there is no single thing that determines whether you end up "normal" or abnormal. This led me to think more about other hypotheses of schizophrenia, and I saw that both articles actually cited previous works that examined the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia. I didn't read those papers, but I did wonder why neither Burrows or Ayhan mentioned the role of dopamine as a prominent hypothesis—not even to provide evidence against that theory.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
Buffington et al. (2016) and Reber et al. (2016) present quite fascinating approaches to studying the interactions or ‘axis’ between the rodent (and human) gut and brain. As the gut is a primary route for bringing things from the environment into our body, these two studies present very clear and convincing evidence for the relevance and translatable validity of their various hypotheses.   One of the most interesting conclusions to me from Buffington et al. was that co-housing three high-fat diet offspring with just one regular-diet offspring was enough to rescue their social behavior deficits and microbiome profiles. This is remarkable, and I would like to hear more about possible mechanisms for this transfer to actually occur. Although the article mentions that mice do eat each other’s feces to transfer microbiota, could there be a certain “threshold” or level of bacteria needed to observe this phenotype switch? That is, how many more high-fat diet mice could have been house...
Post a Comment
Read more