Skip to main content

Week 5

By

            In regards to the first paper, the VSDS seems like a good model for analyzing the effects of emotional stress, but I’m not convinced based on this one paper that it’s a good model for PTSD. I have a difficult time reading about animal models because instinctively, I relate everything back to humans. Not everyone who witnesses something traumatic has PTSD. Also, I wish they did more tests other than weight gain (which returned to control levels), social interaction, elevated plus-maze, and corticosterone levels. They measured social avoidance, but I’m curious if there was also an increase in distress. Why did they measure CORT levels after forced swimming rather than the traumatic reminder of a CD-1 mouse? I wish they measured changes in aggression or changes in sleep that are also characteristic of PTSD. However, I still think that it is a good model to use, as the second paper uses it to discuss neural pathways.
            I found it extremely interesting that in the conclusion of the second paper, the authors mentioned that understanding these circuits would provide insight into conditions like social anxiety and schizophrenia but failed to mention antisocial personality disorder. The two groups that observed a demonstrator being shocked on cue both exhibited increased freezing. Those two groups also had higher social interactions with the demonstrators, driven by the observation of distress, which the authors suggested could reflect empathy. Given that a hallmark characteristic of antisocial personality disorder is a lack of empathy, I’m very curious to see if this pathway has any implications in that disorder. I’m unsure if there are animal models for antisocial personality disorder. I would be curious to see the individual differences in this experiment of the mice who froze in correspondence to the cue to see if some mice inherently froze more for the demonstrator. Are there ever any mice that wouldn’t freeze at all? Or is this emotional contagion so necessary for survival purposes that a complete lack of it doesn’t exist in mice?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more