Skip to main content

Week 4 - Memory Engrams

Both papers this week examine the memory trace originating in the amygdala during fear conditioning. Han et al examined the memory trace and how to eradicate it. Essentially, the researchers found that neurons in the Lateral Amygdala (LA) express CREB to create a fear memory, or the hypothesized memory trace. When those specific cells where selectively killed through dipheria toxin (DT), the mice appeared to forget all fear conditioning for a sustained period of time. The group used controls of mice that were injected with the toxin and had apoptosis, but not on the specific CREB expressing neurons, and the mice still retained fear memory showing the CREB neurons were the ones with the memory trace. Yiu et al furthers Han’s lab research by examining what predisposes a neuron to participant in the memory trace. They find that neuronal excitability immediately before the memory formation is the ultimate factor in determining which neurons express CREB (and are therefore part of the memory trace). 

For Han, while I think the group did many tests and chose a fitting control group to prove the efficacy of their hypothesis and results, I wish they had explored more of the hippocampus’s role. I understand that due to funding and lab limitations, that just may not have been an option, but if memory is a topic, the hippocampus is usually discussed. The lateral amygdala makes sense to study because it is fear conditioning and has functional connections with the hippocampus, but it cannot be the epitome of the whole memory trace. It evidentially plays a very critical role in fear memories as shown through this experiment, but I wonder if the CREB expressing neurons in the LA called on neurons in the hippocampus for the contextual memory itself? Yiu et al briefly looks at the hippocampus, but just in terms of neuron excitability, not its specific functional role in the memory trace. I would be interested in the hippocampus’s role in the memory trace beyond fear conditioning and more in the context of episodic details. To test this, researchers could set up another experiment like last week’s paper and put the mice in different settings, fear condition them, any see if you could specifically ablate cells in the hippocampus and/or amygdala and what effect that has. Additionally, I would be curious to see other forms of fear conditioning besides the auditory fear conditioning used, just to ensure any experimental results are not specific to auditory conditioning.       

Lastly, as Yiu et al’s group touches on in terms of artificially activating the CREB neurons as a cue to retrieve the memory, I think it would be interesting to see how many of these CREB neurons are required to keep the memory trace intact/recall it. For some individuals with ischemic damage to their hippocampal neurons, they are able to retain certain memories as long as the whole hippocampus is not destroyed. While the amygdala is very different, I wonder if it could be the same – if only parts of the neurons are required to recall the memory. For example, if only half of the CREB activated neurons are destroyed, could the fear response still be retained?      

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...