Skip to main content

Week 4 - Memory Engrams

By
Both papers this week examine the memory trace originating in the amygdala during fear conditioning. Han et al examined the memory trace and how to eradicate it. Essentially, the researchers found that neurons in the Lateral Amygdala (LA) express CREB to create a fear memory, or the hypothesized memory trace. When those specific cells where selectively killed through dipheria toxin (DT), the mice appeared to forget all fear conditioning for a sustained period of time. The group used controls of mice that were injected with the toxin and had apoptosis, but not on the specific CREB expressing neurons, and the mice still retained fear memory showing the CREB neurons were the ones with the memory trace. Yiu et al furthers Han’s lab research by examining what predisposes a neuron to participant in the memory trace. They find that neuronal excitability immediately before the memory formation is the ultimate factor in determining which neurons express CREB (and are therefore part of the memory trace). 

For Han, while I think the group did many tests and chose a fitting control group to prove the efficacy of their hypothesis and results, I wish they had explored more of the hippocampus’s role. I understand that due to funding and lab limitations, that just may not have been an option, but if memory is a topic, the hippocampus is usually discussed. The lateral amygdala makes sense to study because it is fear conditioning and has functional connections with the hippocampus, but it cannot be the epitome of the whole memory trace. It evidentially plays a very critical role in fear memories as shown through this experiment, but I wonder if the CREB expressing neurons in the LA called on neurons in the hippocampus for the contextual memory itself? Yiu et al briefly looks at the hippocampus, but just in terms of neuron excitability, not its specific functional role in the memory trace. I would be interested in the hippocampus’s role in the memory trace beyond fear conditioning and more in the context of episodic details. To test this, researchers could set up another experiment like last week’s paper and put the mice in different settings, fear condition them, any see if you could specifically ablate cells in the hippocampus and/or amygdala and what effect that has. Additionally, I would be curious to see other forms of fear conditioning besides the auditory fear conditioning used, just to ensure any experimental results are not specific to auditory conditioning.       

Lastly, as Yiu et al’s group touches on in terms of artificially activating the CREB neurons as a cue to retrieve the memory, I think it would be interesting to see how many of these CREB neurons are required to keep the memory trace intact/recall it. For some individuals with ischemic damage to their hippocampal neurons, they are able to retain certain memories as long as the whole hippocampus is not destroyed. While the amygdala is very different, I wonder if it could be the same – if only parts of the neurons are required to recall the memory. For example, if only half of the CREB activated neurons are destroyed, could the fear response still be retained?      

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more