Skip to main content

Week 4 - Caity Forgey

The paper this week by Yiu et al. (2014) builds off of their earlier work in the paper by Han et al. (2009). Both papers share many of the same authors and come from the Josselyn Lab. Han and colleagues examined the role of lateral amygdala (LA) neurons and the memory trace, and demonstrated their mechanism to selectively erase an auditory fear memory by ablation of LA neurons included in the trace. To do this, they used diptheria toxin (DT) to ablate neurons overexpressing the transcription factor CREB. They found that their tactic successfully erased a learned fear memory and the effects were long-lasting and robust. In the second paper by Yiu and colleagues, this finding was built upon by examining whether expression of CREB, or excitability in general, would preferentially recruit specific LA neurons into a memory trace. Yiu et al. demonstrated this through the use of CREB, dnKCNQ2, hM3Dq+DREADD+CNO, and optogenetics. Their findings confirmed the competitive recruitment of the most excitable neurons (compared to their neighboring neurons) into a memory trace, that this is specific to the LA neurons (rather than CeA or BA) and is specific to the learned fear memory and not general anxiety-like behaviors.

Together, these findings provide a case for the importance of excitatory pyramidal LA neurons for the formation (and ablation) of  a learned fear memory. This has clinical applications for disorders that rely on fearful memories, such as PTSD. I am interested in seeing how this would apply to other mood disorders, like depression and anxiety, which are strongly correlated with the experience of trauma. Obviously, we cannot just open a human brain and stimulate or inhibit some neurons to eliminate PTSD, but this could provide a potential target region for pharmacological treatments.

I would also like to see additional work investigating memories of different connotations, such as reward learning, pleasant memories, neutral memories, and sad (but not fearful) memories. It is possible that LA neurons would not be implicated in these types of memories, or that other amygdalar regions would be more so implicated in emotional memory traces of different valences and arousal levels.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...

Gut-brain axis

This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...