Skip to main content

Week 3: Memory Engrams

By

In 2012, Ramirez et al. made an astounding discovery when they were successful in using optogenetic techniques to manipulate memory engram-bearing hippocampal neurons for the recollection of artificially implanted memories. Using this first experiment as a precursor, they proposed exploiting this model as a potential alleviation for stress response and depressive-like behavior three years later. Both studies used transgenic c-fos-tTA mice injected with an AAV encoding ChR2-mCherry to specifically label cells in the dentate gyrus, which were then reactivated during a behavioral fear conditioning paradigm in different contexts to control for memory. After exposure to context “A” and a subsequent foot shock paired with electrical light pulses while in context “B”, mice demonstrated freezing response when placed back in context “A”. The data elicits the idea that fear can be activated regardless of whether the aversive foot shock was provided in that context, hence the induction of false memories if encoded in the same engram. The second publication especially stood out to me, being that the overall results indicate that chronic stimulation of DG cells associated with positive memory leads to significant stress-induced behaviors as well as an increase in neurogenesis.

After reading both papers, I also watched Ramirez’s TED Talk (2017) where he explained how he derived his motivation behind the experiments. It brought me to thinking what would happen if we could indeed erase traumatic and stressful memories in humans as a “cure” for anxiety and mood related disorders. The translational implications of this is tremendous, being that this means a potential alternative to traditional corrective methods such as antidepressants. Neuroscientists have toyed with the idea of altering and destroying memories for sometime now, especially with the radical electroconvulsive therapy. An optogenetic alternative poses a (much) more specific and direct target of engram disruption, which could be quite useful in a clinical setting. And although it is accompanied by ethical and moral dilemmas—for instance, would “deleting” a traumatic event prevent our past from informing our present selves—it achieves plasticity at a faster rate than any medication would. The data is exciting, but we certainly still have ways to make before reconfiguring the mnemonic memory circuit becomes the standard for treating maladaptive behavior.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more