Skip to main content

Week 3: Memory Engrams (Ramirez 2013 & 2015)

By
This week, we looked at two articles published by Steve Ramirez and colleagues, the first published in 2013, and the second published in 2015. The first article established the idea that false memories could be generated in the hippocampus by activating a specific subpopulation of cells in the dentate gyrus. They did this by using optogenetics to visualize the cells and foot shocks as part of the fear condition to create the memories. It is also important to note that fear conditioning is used to generate these memories, therefore heavily incorporating the amygdala as part of the emotional context of the memory. The second Ramirez article expands on this further by activating cells in various brain regions. This is part of the reason that regardless of the accuracy of the memory (genuine vs false), the mice would still exhibit the emotional fear response. The researchers tried to determine whether activating CA1 cells would also create false memories. However, they were not able to recreate a false memory by stimulating CA1 cells, suggesting that the position of the dentate gyrus within the circuit of memory formation may allow for varied inputs leading to the creation of false memories. 

The second Ramirez article expanded on the ideas introduced in the first by exploring the effect of memory engrams in depression-like behaviors. In the first of their studies, they exposed a set of mice to a “positive experience”, a “neutral experience”, or a stressful “negative experience”. Later, they reactivated dentate gyrus cells that were active during the “positive experiences” and found that reactivating these cells can reverse the behavioral effects of the stress induced by the various tests given to the mice. The next set of experiments aimed to look further at the circuits involved in memory engrams. It is relevant that they looked at the nucleus accumbens and the amygdala because of their involvement in emotional memory encoding and fear/reward circuitry. The nucleus accumbens is one of the regions that receives dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area, which is known to be associated with reward. Further, the amygdala is involved with fear, but more specifically with the emotional context in which these memories are encoded. Recent literature has shown that there is a loop that forms between the VTA and the hippocampus. In this loop, the CA1 projects to the subiculum, which in turn projects to the nucleus accumbens, then through the ventral pallidum to the VTA. The projections from the VTA to the dentate of the hippocampus is important for enhancement of long term potentiation, so it is possible that this mechanism could be involved in the behavioral effect of decreasing depressive-like behaviors seen in this article.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more