Skip to main content

Week 3: Memory Engrams (Ramirez 2013 & 2015)

By
This week, we looked at two articles published by Steve Ramirez and colleagues, the first published in 2013, and the second published in 2015. The first article established the idea that false memories could be generated in the hippocampus by activating a specific subpopulation of cells in the dentate gyrus. They did this by using optogenetics to visualize the cells and foot shocks as part of the fear condition to create the memories. It is also important to note that fear conditioning is used to generate these memories, therefore heavily incorporating the amygdala as part of the emotional context of the memory. The second Ramirez article expands on this further by activating cells in various brain regions. This is part of the reason that regardless of the accuracy of the memory (genuine vs false), the mice would still exhibit the emotional fear response. The researchers tried to determine whether activating CA1 cells would also create false memories. However, they were not able to recreate a false memory by stimulating CA1 cells, suggesting that the position of the dentate gyrus within the circuit of memory formation may allow for varied inputs leading to the creation of false memories. 

The second Ramirez article expanded on the ideas introduced in the first by exploring the effect of memory engrams in depression-like behaviors. In the first of their studies, they exposed a set of mice to a “positive experience”, a “neutral experience”, or a stressful “negative experience”. Later, they reactivated dentate gyrus cells that were active during the “positive experiences” and found that reactivating these cells can reverse the behavioral effects of the stress induced by the various tests given to the mice. The next set of experiments aimed to look further at the circuits involved in memory engrams. It is relevant that they looked at the nucleus accumbens and the amygdala because of their involvement in emotional memory encoding and fear/reward circuitry. The nucleus accumbens is one of the regions that receives dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area, which is known to be associated with reward. Further, the amygdala is involved with fear, but more specifically with the emotional context in which these memories are encoded. Recent literature has shown that there is a loop that forms between the VTA and the hippocampus. In this loop, the CA1 projects to the subiculum, which in turn projects to the nucleus accumbens, then through the ventral pallidum to the VTA. The projections from the VTA to the dentate of the hippocampus is important for enhancement of long term potentiation, so it is possible that this mechanism could be involved in the behavioral effect of decreasing depressive-like behaviors seen in this article.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more