Skip to main content

Ramirez et al. 2013 and 2015

By


In the first Ramirez paper, published in 2013, scientists created false fear memories in mice through use of optogenetic stimulation of the dentate gyrus (DG) or CA3. When reading the methodology of this paper, my first thoughts were of the potential that this type of research could have once we have advance further with two photon imaging (from my understanding, DG is hard or can’t be imaged because it is too dense and also there is limited mobility). Only being able to view the neurons post-experimentation leaves room for interpretation, but being able to see the neurons associated with the fear reactivation and context in live-time would support this study even further. I also would have like the exposure to the fear conditioning and different contexts to be longer, to see if there could be more neurons involved in these processes.
The second Ramirez paper, published in 2015, took the concept of memory manipulation from the 2013 paper and explored its therapeutic implementation. Interestingly, by activating positive memories via optogenetic stimulation of DG Ramirez was able to prevent the effects of the depressive behaviors. One part of the paper I found particularly compelling was the analysis showing that activation of the positive memory prevented decreases in neurogenesis caused by stress. I thought this was a very direct way to look at the effects that activation of the positive memory had in the DG whereas the behavioral tests were less so.
Overall, I thought the papers flowed together very nicely with Ramirez et. Al 2013 setting a baseline for Ramirez et al. 2015. The papers were well-supported and thorough, with Ramirez et al. 2015 having a more direct correlation to human behavior. Future directions for Ramirez et al. 2015 include increasing the 5-day stimulation protocol to account for potential longer term effects.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more