Skip to main content

Ramirez et al. 2013 and 2015

By


In the first Ramirez paper, published in 2013, scientists created false fear memories in mice through use of optogenetic stimulation of the dentate gyrus (DG) or CA3. When reading the methodology of this paper, my first thoughts were of the potential that this type of research could have once we have advance further with two photon imaging (from my understanding, DG is hard or can’t be imaged because it is too dense and also there is limited mobility). Only being able to view the neurons post-experimentation leaves room for interpretation, but being able to see the neurons associated with the fear reactivation and context in live-time would support this study even further. I also would have like the exposure to the fear conditioning and different contexts to be longer, to see if there could be more neurons involved in these processes.
The second Ramirez paper, published in 2015, took the concept of memory manipulation from the 2013 paper and explored its therapeutic implementation. Interestingly, by activating positive memories via optogenetic stimulation of DG Ramirez was able to prevent the effects of the depressive behaviors. One part of the paper I found particularly compelling was the analysis showing that activation of the positive memory prevented decreases in neurogenesis caused by stress. I thought this was a very direct way to look at the effects that activation of the positive memory had in the DG whereas the behavioral tests were less so.
Overall, I thought the papers flowed together very nicely with Ramirez et. Al 2013 setting a baseline for Ramirez et al. 2015. The papers were well-supported and thorough, with Ramirez et al. 2015 having a more direct correlation to human behavior. Future directions for Ramirez et al. 2015 include increasing the 5-day stimulation protocol to account for potential longer term effects.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more