Skip to main content

Ramirez 2013 & 2015

This week we investigated two article written by Steve Ramirez, a PI at Boston Universities Center for Memory & Brain. His two articles focus on using optogenetics as an intervention in two memory paradigms. The first article published in 2013 is titles "Creating a False Memory in the Hippocampus". The basis for this experiment was proving that mice were able to falsely encode a memory and identifying the cells and circuits involved in this process. By using ontogenetic manipulation Ramirez and his team were able to create a false memory by stimulating select cells in the dente gyrus  (DG) of the hippocampus in mice. The mice were first allowed to familiarize themselves with place "A" while cells in the DG or CA1 were labeled with ChR2-mCherry. Mice were then fear conditioned by pairing an electric foot shock with simultaneous pulses of light in place "B", optically reactivating the cells labeled in place A. When the mice were returned to place A the expressed fear conditioned freezing behavior similar to when reintroduced to place B, however they did not exhibit increase in freezing behavior compared to baseline when placed in novel place "C". Ramirez and his team went on further to distinguish the DG from CA1 cells in their involvement in encoding false memories and even show that false memories can be induced. The findings from this study shed light in the dynamic interaction between false and genuine memories as well as the specific cells involved in these processes.
Ramirez and his team's second article is entitled "Activating positive memory engrams suppresses press ion-like behavior". This article is jarringly different from several of our previous studies. Previous articles focused on inducing depressive behaviors. This article explores optogenetics as an intervention for acute rescue of depressive-like behaviors by targeting specific glutamanergice cells i the hippocampus-amygdala-nucleus accumbent pathway. By activating cells associated with a positive memory engram the team was able to reverse depressive behaviors associated with anhedonia and motivation (sucrose preference test and tail-suspension test). These methods were less effective for anxiety related behaviors such as those associate with an open-file test and elevated plus maze test. This touches on a topic we have discussed at lengths during class. Animal models are able to produce quantifiable behavioral measures as representations of anxiety and depression, however they are limited in their specificity and clinical application. The overlap of symptoms of anxiety and depression blur the lines for treatment in human subjects and specificity of animal models. While this experiment, like many others, was not necessarily applicable to both anxiety and depression, it did suggest a new route for fast acting anti-depressant treatment. The activation of cells associated with positive memories acted as quickly as some of the less conventional anti-depressant methods such as deep-brain stimulation and ketamine. Due to the slow acting effects of typical AD medications such as SSRIs, it is vital we continue to explore new methods of treating these psychiatric disorders with more immediate and for effective responses.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...