Skip to main content

Post 5

By

The first of the two papers, Sial et al. was a very easy-read. I love a straight-forward methods paper and thought the concept was interesting approach to modeling PTSD. It would have been nice to see measures of anxiety other than just the elevated plus maze and social interaction task. Something else that they also mention very briefly at the beginning of the paper is the fact that the social hierarchy of the mice that are kept together might have affected the results. This made me think that maybe if the observer mouse had been watching a strange mouse get attacked rather than one of its littermate’s the results would have been significantly different, similar to how if I saw a stranger get beat up vs. my sibling I might respond differently. A limitation Sial et al. mentioned was how they had been unsuccessful getting their experiments to work in females due to attacker mouse being more interested in a female observer rather than attacking the other male. This made sense to me, but a year after this paper came out, a paper entitled “Vicarious Social Defeat Stress Induces Depression-related Outcomes in Female Mice” by Iñiguez et al. (2017)  using the vicarious social defeat stress paradigm with females was released. They provided no explanation for how they got their experiments to work which makes me skeptical but I still thought it was intriguing .
The second paper, Allsop et. al. was multi-faceted. I liked the incorporation of the VSDS into the paper but also thought it was exciting that this paper used a different type of observational learning. I thought the most compelling part of this paper was division of animals in five behavioral groups. When the first started talking about the behavioral, I said aloud “what is they did a group where the animal didn’t receive a shock first?” and a few sentences later there was the naïve observer group.
Overall, these papers were very enjoyable and my favorites of the ones we have read thus far.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more