Skip to main content

Post 4

By

The two papers for this week, Han et al.(2009) and Yiu et al. (2014), delve into the concept of a subpopulation of neurons in the lateral amygdala (LA) that have increased cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element-binding protein (CREB) are preferentially activated by fear memory expression and enhance fear memory formation. I found the papers effective in analyzing fear memories, but the paper go back and forth between saying memories and fear memories. I found the use of just memories misleading and not a claim either paper can support based on the methods and analyses performed.
Han et al. (2009) sets up a foundation for the research conducted in Yiu et al. (2014). Han’s approach to fear memories was straight forward. I would have like if they had used more than one fear conditioning technique because although foot shock is widely accepted, it is difficult to measure fear response based solely on freezing. Same for Yiu et. al; this paper also only uses freezing as an indicator of a fear memory. However, Yiu et al does a more thorough paradigm, with both weak training and strong training, making me inclined to believe this research.
Discussing the methods leads me into the biggest flaw of I found in this paper. This is the use of memories vs. fear memories. Both papers use fear conditioning and can therefore support an argument with fear memories but these papers don’t address other contexts of memories and cannot make a larger, more general claim that neurons in the LA that have increased CREB are preferentially activated by memory expression and enhance memory formation. They could make this claim if they associated the introduce other tasks such as a novel object recognition task or with a rewarding stimulus instead a fear-inducing stimulus. I think that the wording of these papers is their downfall and it would have been a stronger argument if they stuck with the words fear memory.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more