Skip to main content

Post 4- Understanding the Memory Trace or Engram

By

The two papers Han et al (2009) and Yiu et al (2014) both portray the importance of localization of memory trace within the brain. Han et al include an activated fear response and detect whether killing activated neurons removes memory of the experience. Death in neurons that overexpress CREB resulted in suppression of auditory fear memory. The neurons that overexpress CREB rather than the number of LA neurons affect this suppression. Furthermore, Yiu et al expands the model with multiple control experiments to add additional support to Han et al’s findings. In addition to the lateral amygdala (LA), they also test different regions (such as the central and basal amygdala). There were no significant differences nor memory enhancements with CREB overexpression in the other parts of the amygdala. Thereby, the findings appear to be specific to the LA in mice. 

The papers have provided further understanding to that neurons are a predominant factor to memory storage in our brains. It provides insight into a new way of understanding memory contrary to general psychological beliefs of how memory localization (engrams rather than large regions). Prior to reading these papers, I mainly thought of memory as relatively permanent in our brains, but with advanced techniques it appears to be possible to remove specific memories, especially in rodents. 

However, I believe that it would be beneficial if the researchers expanded their investigation to more brain areas that are known to encode memory. The amygdala is responsible for fear memories, but the hippocampus, cerebellum and prefrontal cortex are also responsible for memory functions of different forms. It would be interesting to see an extension of the investigation in response to memory engrams within the dentate gyrus or the cerebellum to gain further insight into the procedural or motor memories that mice may exhibit. Findings of memory engrams erased in these additional areas would be helpful in providing a greater comprehension of the initial process presented in the studies. Thus, it may be certain that fear conditioning would not deliver any significant findings in other parts of the brain, so these regions would therefore need a different conditioning/stimulus. What kinds of stimuli, similar to fear memory could instead be used when investigating other brain regions (apart from the amygdala), and their response to memory engrams? How likely is it that these findings will align with the ones of the two studies?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more