Skip to main content

Post 4: CREB and fear memory extinction/enhancement

By
Upon reading and rereading Han et al. (2009), I found myself left with many questions. I wondered why LA neurons with increased CREB are preferentially activated by fear memories/recruited for memory traces, whether CREB has the same effect in other brain regions, and whether its effects are limited to auditory fear memories, to name a few. Upon reading Yiu et al. (2014), many of my uncertainties stemming from Han et al. were clarified, but again I was left with questions regarding methods and implications of this study for future research. 

While Yui was very comprehensive in its methods of investigation, experimental groups, and controls, I wondered why there was not a greater reliance on temporally precise methods of neuronal activation/excitement such as hM3Dq DREADD and especially optogenetics. It seems that the relatively large window of the transgene expression using HSV could lead to enhanced encoding of memories outside of the fear training and/or testing, and an expansion of their more precise methods could have generated even more accurate results. Additionally, there seemed to be a focus on the activation of small portionsof LA neurons for increased fear memories, but there was no investigation or mention of what happens when larger proportions of LA neurons are activated. Because it was found that the same small number of neurons was involved in memory traces in these investigations, I would hypothesize that a larger number of activated LA neurons would lead to a memory trace of the same size that is potentially weaker due to increased competition between cells overexpressing CREB. 

On a broader level, I considered the implications of this research and how its findings may be applied in future research or therapeutic methods. One of my most pressing questions while reading both of these papers was whether CREB overexpression enhances memory traces in other brain regions and/or for types of memories other than auditory fear memories that may be more complex. While Yui did confirm that there is no memory enhancement with CREB overexpression in the lateral or central amygdala, I wonder if this is due to the fact that only auditory fear memories were investigated, and I would be interested in an investigation of whether CREB activity in brain regions outside the amygdala are involved in non-fear memory traces. As for the types of memories influenced by CREB overexpression, it is essential for potential clinical applications of these findings to know whether CREB overexpression may be involved in the enhancement of more complex fear memories, as seen in PTSD. If so, these LA neurons could be a future target for treatment of PTSD in humans, offering a way to extinguish specific fear memories without damaging more than a small number of neurons. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more