Skip to main content

Post 3: Ramirez et al. 2013 & 2015

By
In the first article published by Ramirez and colleagues in 2013, they present a technique that they used to create and evoke a false fear memory using optogenetic stimulation of hippocampal DG cells. In the second article (2015), Ramirez and colleagues use optogenetic stimulation of DG cells to revive a past positive memory and show that this can be used to alleviate depressive behaviors.

The 2013 article demonstrated the utility of the false memory creation technique in fear memory experiments and the specificity of the dentate gyrus in this mechanism. The authors found that light-activated false memories were qualitatively equal to real memories, could be additive to or competitive with genuine memories, and that stimulation to the DG - but not CA1 neurons - can evoke a false memory. This work set the stage for using optogenetic stimulation to reactivate positive memories in different contexts in their 2015 work.

In the 2015 study, Ramirez and colleagues optogenetics to reactivate a positive memory in mice that have undergone chronic immobilization stress to induce anxiety- and depression-related symptoms. The animals were tested on two anxiety measures (open field test (OFT) and elevated plus maze test (EPMT)) and two depression measures (tail suspension test (TST) and sucrose preference test (SPT)). Their findings suggested that reactivating a positive memory can rescue stress-induced depressive behaviors, but not anxious behaviors. Chronically repeated reactivation of a positive memory can create a longer lasting reversal in depressive behaviors and increase neurogenesis activity, but repeatedly exposing a stressed mouse to a positive experience is not enough to alleviate depressive behaviors.

Ramirez and colleagues' first study in 2013 allowed them to introduce a technique, demonstrate its ability to manipulate memories, and let others validate it as well. This made a way for their work in 2015 to be accepted and taken at its value. The value of emotional memories in disorders like depression, anxiety, and PTSD is potentially life-changing. Being able to manipulate these memories and examine the pathways that underlie mood disorders in the way that Ramirez and colleagues did in their 2015 study could be the basis of developing new, more effective treatments for depression and understanding the ways that current effective treatments work to alleviate depressive symptoms.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more