Skip to main content

Post 3: Memory Engrams

By
The complex yet multifunctional organization of systems in the brain allows us to use the same techniques and knowledge for seemingly distinct purpose. Papers published by Ramirez in 2013 and 2015 demonstrate this by using optogenetics to artificially activate memories in the hippocampus to determine whether false fear memories can be generated for a context in which there was no fear induction and to determine whether activation of positive memories can suppress depression and anxiety-related behaviors, respectively. Ramirez et al. (2015) were able to repurpose the techniques first used in their 2013 paper to investigate whether their techniques could be useful for reducing the behavioral effects of mood disorders.

One thing I am most curious about after reading these papers is how humans would experience reactivation of previous memories if this technique were adapted for humans for therapeutic purposes. In mice, we can measure only behavioral outcomes and physical changes in the brain, and behavioral results suggesting memories of the fear associated with foot shocks (Ramirez 2013) and of the happy state associated with positive memories (Ramirez 2015) are seen. However, in humans we can also assess thoughts and mental state; I would be interested to know whether artificial activation of neurons active in the dentate gyrus during a positive memory, for example, elicit the positive memory itself, or simply the positive emotions associated with it. While such an investigation is not ethically or logistically possible now, its results seem crucial to determine the breadth of influence such technologies could have for mood disorders and many other functions.

Another thing I found interesting about the Ramirez (2015) paper in particular was that there was distinction between anxiolytic behaviors and depressive behaviors, both in their classification in the methods and the results yielded. Often, anxiety and depression are grouped together in animal research, so it was interesting to see results that consistently showed depressive, but not anxiety-like behaviors, to be ameliorated by a technique. Such differentiation points to a possible way to specifically target depression.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more