Skip to main content

Paper Response #3: Memory Engrams

By

WEEK 4: Feb. 3 Papers (Ramirez et. al, 2013 and 2015)

Both of Ramirez’s papers examine the effects of optogenetically reactivating dentate gyrus (DG) memory engram cells, but in different contexts and for very different purposes. 

In the 2013 paper, Ramirez and his team identified DG engram cells in mice that were activated during exploration of a neutral environment, and reactivated them during fear conditioning in a different context to create a new, false memory in the hippocampus. As a result, the mice learned to associate the neutral environment with the negatively salient stimulus (foot shock) they experienced during fear conditioning, despite never having been exposed to said stimulus in the neutral environment. A false memory had now been created in the mice’s hippocampi of experiencing pain and fear in a context where they had not experienced these things, thus combining two separate memories and eliciting an observable behavioral fear response (freezing). 

This study moves us closer to understanding the mechanisms by which false memories are created in humans, an area of great interest in both psychiatry and the fields of criminal justice and law enforcement, as false memories in witness statements are not uncommon but can be highly problematic and complicate investigations. However, as mice cannot verbally communicate with us, we are left with many questions about the shape these artificially created memories take. Do mice really “remember” these experiences that never happened in a conscious way, or are their behavioral fear responses merely the result of neuronal impulses with no emotional association or mental representation beyond self-preservation and instinct? Additionally, this paper raises questions about the practical implications of creating new memories beyond simply furthering our understanding of how false memories work. If the spread of misinformation is already an issue in our society today, how much worse would it be if others could generate false memories in our brains at will? Could this technique be modified to be used medically, perhaps to help patients with dementia and related disorders recover memories? The ethical ramifications of all of this would be complex to navigate.

Conversely, in the 2015 paper, Ramirez and his team reversed depression-related behaviors in mice that had been induced by stress by reactivating DG engram cells that had previously been active during a positive experience. This also rescued neurogenesis. Importantly, the beneficial effects of reactivating engram cells associated with a positive memory were mediated by the DG-Basolateral Amygdala (BLA)-Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc) pathway, and inhibiting the DG-Medial Prefrontal Cortex (mPFC)-NAcc pathway did not interfere with this rescue process. 

The results of the 2015 study have more clear real-world applications, namely as a potential treatment for depression that has the benefit of being fast-acting. It is clear to see that Ramirez built on his 2013 research on memory engram cells and further developed it while exploring a completely new angle. It would be interesting to see what other memory-related avenues of research could be opened by examining and manipulating DG engram cells further, like for example intentionally erasing memories instead of creating new ones. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more