In “Selective Erasure of Fear Memory”, Han et al. observed that
neurons in the lateral amygdala with relatively increased levels of the transcription
factor CREB are known to be preferentially activated by auditory fear memory. The
literature demonstrates the idea that overexpression of CREB using HSV and then
a subsequent ablation of these neurons in iDTR transgenic mice causes selective
memory erasure. Memory was behaviorally assessed pre and post induction of cell
death in tagged LA neurons, and increasing CREB in a subpopulation of LA
neurons enhances a weak memory and specifically ablating these neurons reverses
this enhancement. Furthermore, if neurons overexpressing CREB are deleted, the
result is long-lasting memory loss in CREB-cre mice and there is no evidence of
memory recovery.
Yiu et al. conducts a robust series of experiments in a
later publication elucidating that memory allocation is partially based on
relative neuronal excitability of LA pyramidal/principal neuronal subpopulations
at the time of conditioning or training. Although Yiu et al. is most robust in
their methodologies, Han et al. really laid down the groundwork for exploring LA
neurons with increased CREB in memory tracing.
Han et al. disclosed that although CREB plays an imperative
role, increasing it in a subpopulation of LA neurons does not further enhance a
strong memory. Moreover, Yiu et al. also discusses how the memory-enhancing
effect of CREB is prevented by the decreasing excitability in the LA
pyramidal/principal neurons. This stood out to me and I would be curious to see
if manipulation or overexpression of any subpopulation of neurons in the LA
could potentially have memory confabulation. We know the amygdala is heavily
implicated in valence association, so I would be curious to see whether manipulation
of the LA neurons could tag a negative memory as a positive one and vice versa.
This idea was slightly presented in Steve Ramirez’s work on the DG, but the
amygdala is so much more involved in emotional processing than the hippocampus
so I’m wondering if this would generate more robust data. I’m both curious and
excited to see how down the road, once research is more solid, how we apply
this data clinically, and whether the engram will be deciphered in my lifetime.
Comments
Post a Comment