Skip to main content

Fear Memory Traces, Han & Yiu


Similar to the Ramirez papers studying memory engrams, the papers by Han et al and Yiu et al studied memory traces related to fear. However, Han and Yiu specifically studied fear memories in the amygdala rather than the hippocampus. Specifically, Han and Yiu studied the lateral amygdala (LA) and the transcription factor CREB in auditory fear conditioning. Han’s paper, published in 2009, answered the question, “is CREB necessary in creating a fear memory trace?” Yiu’s paper, published in 2014, built off of Han’s paper to answer the questions, “are certain neurons in the LA responsible for creating a fear memory trace? If so, by what mechanism?”

The Han paper, in my opinion, was pretty straightforward and gave good insight about CREB and its function in the LA. To put it simply, Han et al reported that, without CREB, the LA cannot form a fear memory. The techniques used were clean, and the results of inactivating neurons overexpressing CREB showed robust effects on freezing. Though Yiu et al were working on a related topic, their techniques relied heavily on transgene expression through viral vectors. Although Yiu et al saw robust effects with their methods, the complex experimental techniques always make me skeptical until another project is able to reproduce their effects. Additionally, the use of specific transcription factors like CREB and specific ion channels (both naturally occurring and transgenic, i.e., KCNQ2, KCNQ3, and dnKCNQ2) may show effects in mice as model organisms, but may not translate to human physiology. For these reasons, I am not completely convinced by the results reported by the Yiu paper.

The Han and Yiu papers both thoroughly studied the LA with respect to the formation and retention of a fear memory trace. Although they showed specific molecular mechanisms underlying these fear memories, their focused attention on the LA makes me wonder what the roles of the other subdivisions of the amygdala are. The Yiu paper includes the central and basal amygdala (CeA and BA, respectively) in their experiments, but show that they are not involved in enhancing a fear memory like the LA. Does this imply that the CeA and BA are involved in emotions other than fear? The amygdala is typically implicated in fear-related behaviors, but is it possible that the CeA and BA discretely contribute to behaviors related to other emotions such as happiness and sadness? I think these would be interesting topics to explore more.

One (very random) thing that I noticed about the Yiu paper was how quickly it was accepted for publication after being submitted—22 days! Does this mean that this is accepted as a new standard of truth for the formation of fear memories in rodents? Maybe the publication process does not depend on the dates listed on the paper, but if the paper truly was published 22 days after submission, I’m very impressed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...

Gut-brain axis

This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...