Skip to main content

Fear Memory Traces, Han & Yiu


Similar to the Ramirez papers studying memory engrams, the papers by Han et al and Yiu et al studied memory traces related to fear. However, Han and Yiu specifically studied fear memories in the amygdala rather than the hippocampus. Specifically, Han and Yiu studied the lateral amygdala (LA) and the transcription factor CREB in auditory fear conditioning. Han’s paper, published in 2009, answered the question, “is CREB necessary in creating a fear memory trace?” Yiu’s paper, published in 2014, built off of Han’s paper to answer the questions, “are certain neurons in the LA responsible for creating a fear memory trace? If so, by what mechanism?”

The Han paper, in my opinion, was pretty straightforward and gave good insight about CREB and its function in the LA. To put it simply, Han et al reported that, without CREB, the LA cannot form a fear memory. The techniques used were clean, and the results of inactivating neurons overexpressing CREB showed robust effects on freezing. Though Yiu et al were working on a related topic, their techniques relied heavily on transgene expression through viral vectors. Although Yiu et al saw robust effects with their methods, the complex experimental techniques always make me skeptical until another project is able to reproduce their effects. Additionally, the use of specific transcription factors like CREB and specific ion channels (both naturally occurring and transgenic, i.e., KCNQ2, KCNQ3, and dnKCNQ2) may show effects in mice as model organisms, but may not translate to human physiology. For these reasons, I am not completely convinced by the results reported by the Yiu paper.

The Han and Yiu papers both thoroughly studied the LA with respect to the formation and retention of a fear memory trace. Although they showed specific molecular mechanisms underlying these fear memories, their focused attention on the LA makes me wonder what the roles of the other subdivisions of the amygdala are. The Yiu paper includes the central and basal amygdala (CeA and BA, respectively) in their experiments, but show that they are not involved in enhancing a fear memory like the LA. Does this imply that the CeA and BA are involved in emotions other than fear? The amygdala is typically implicated in fear-related behaviors, but is it possible that the CeA and BA discretely contribute to behaviors related to other emotions such as happiness and sadness? I think these would be interesting topics to explore more.

One (very random) thing that I noticed about the Yiu paper was how quickly it was accepted for publication after being submitted—22 days! Does this mean that this is accepted as a new standard of truth for the formation of fear memories in rodents? Maybe the publication process does not depend on the dates listed on the paper, but if the paper truly was published 22 days after submission, I’m very impressed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...

Sial & Allsop

Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...

Buffington and Reber

Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...