Skip to main content

Fear memories and CREB

By
In order for a fear memory to encoded, neurons must be recruited to a trace or engram in which become responsible not just for encoding that memory but in subsequent recall. It is speculated currently what determines a neurons affinity to be recruited as such. Both papers from Sheena Josselyn’s lab present convincing evidence of a mechanism behind the likelihood of a fear memory to be encoded. Through both inhibition of the CREB transcription factor, it is implicated that a higher expression of this transcription factor that is responsive to Ca2+/cAMP binding. 
In the first paper, Han et al. 2009, a tool is established to selectively kill lateral amygdala neurons in order to erase a fear memory. While this is substantially shown given the lower freezing recall after erasure. But, the data does not necessarily conclude how this model may affect encoding. As these neurons were only killed after the fear memory was encoded, it is possible that they are only responsible for the retrieval through the lateral amygdala. As much communication is bidirectional in the lateral amygdala, it might be interesting to see if they are responsible for the initial encoding as well. For example, If these neurons were selectively killed before the training, they might show the same decreased recall affect, implicating them in the true scope of the memory. It is also interesting that all the DTR mice had a much lower freezing percentage at baseline before the tone plays. This might be indicative of some secondary effects of the vector or just bad sampling of mice. 
With respect to the next paper, Yiu et al 2014, the study aims to narrow on this overexpression of CREB’s ability to more selectively recruit neurons into a memory trace. It is clearly seen that CREB increases a neurons excitability and memory retrieval of a fearful stimulus. Interestingly, this population of LA neurons that over-expressed CREB were only a very small percentage. It is possible that these neurons are selective towards even subtypes of fear. To test this, it would be enlightening to see if the effect of CREB excitability in this subpopulation creates a reproducible effect in other contexts of fear. If so, then this finding has huge implications in overall brain functionality when responding to stress and recruiting cells to create memories. 
            

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more