Skip to main content

Fear memories and CREB

In order for a fear memory to encoded, neurons must be recruited to a trace or engram in which become responsible not just for encoding that memory but in subsequent recall. It is speculated currently what determines a neurons affinity to be recruited as such. Both papers from Sheena Josselyn’s lab present convincing evidence of a mechanism behind the likelihood of a fear memory to be encoded. Through both inhibition of the CREB transcription factor, it is implicated that a higher expression of this transcription factor that is responsive to Ca2+/cAMP binding. 
In the first paper, Han et al. 2009, a tool is established to selectively kill lateral amygdala neurons in order to erase a fear memory. While this is substantially shown given the lower freezing recall after erasure. But, the data does not necessarily conclude how this model may affect encoding. As these neurons were only killed after the fear memory was encoded, it is possible that they are only responsible for the retrieval through the lateral amygdala. As much communication is bidirectional in the lateral amygdala, it might be interesting to see if they are responsible for the initial encoding as well. For example, If these neurons were selectively killed before the training, they might show the same decreased recall affect, implicating them in the true scope of the memory. It is also interesting that all the DTR mice had a much lower freezing percentage at baseline before the tone plays. This might be indicative of some secondary effects of the vector or just bad sampling of mice. 
With respect to the next paper, Yiu et al 2014, the study aims to narrow on this overexpression of CREB’s ability to more selectively recruit neurons into a memory trace. It is clearly seen that CREB increases a neurons excitability and memory retrieval of a fearful stimulus. Interestingly, this population of LA neurons that over-expressed CREB were only a very small percentage. It is possible that these neurons are selective towards even subtypes of fear. To test this, it would be enlightening to see if the effect of CREB excitability in this subpopulation creates a reproducible effect in other contexts of fear. If so, then this finding has huge implications in overall brain functionality when responding to stress and recruiting cells to create memories. 
            

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...

Sial & Allsop

Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...

Buffington and Reber

Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...