Skip to main content

Blog Post 4: Han et al. 2009 and Yiu et al. 2014

By
The papers by Han et al. and Yiu et al. demonstrate that neurons with increased CREB in the lateral amygdala (LA) are preferentially recruited into the memory trace, specifically with respect to a fear memory. The paper by Han et al. from 2009 underscores the necessity of this specific neuronal subpopulation by ablating these neurons, which resulted in a loss of the fear memory. The paper by Yiu et al. from 2014 builds on this further, explaining that increased excitability in LA neurons resulted in enhanced memory formation. While I believe that both papers provide very convincing and exciting data, I have a hard time understanding how this can be applicable in any clinical setting. 
The concept of ablating only the neurons that overexpress CREB and that are allocated to a specific fear memory, in order to permanently erase that memory, sounds lovely, especially with regards to treatment for PTSD. However, how this could ever be done in humans is beyond me. I do believe that the findings presented in both of these papers are important to a greater understanding of the way neurons in the amygdala encode a specific memory, but I think it is far away from being applicable clinically. Obviously we cannot ablate populations of neurons in humans, but do these findings point towards the need to target very specific brain areas when treating disorders like PTSD? Specifically, does this have any implications for possible uses of TMS to target circuitry in the BLA and hopefully relieve the symptoms of PTSD?
Also, the paper by Yiu et al. addressed the baseline level of anxiety of the mice to demonstrate that the freezing was caused by increasing excitability in LA neurons, rather than an overall increase in anxiety. To do so, they used open field and elevated plus maze, and their findings suggest that there was no significant difference in the levels of anxiety in the CREB, dnKCNQ2, or GFP (control) mice. However, they used both male and female mice in their study, and their only measure of fear was freezing. As we know, male and female rodents often display different phenotypes of fear and anxiety, so I would have liked to see a more in-depth analysis of fear expression and anxiety levels. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al. and Reber et al.: Gut-Brain Interactions

By
While I have not encountered a lot of gut-brain interaction literature yet. I found each paper unique and fascinating. Reber et al felt inaccessible for me. I felt like I didn’t understand what the goal of the paper really was and why they did the tests that they did. It seems like most of their relevant information got shoved into numerous supplementary figures and their behavior was quite difficult to follow. Multiple sections of their paper were supported with data found entirely in supplementary figures, which makes it difficult to follow the same conclusions. I have a few issues with the behavior they chose and because of this, I struggle to find driving conclusions from their work. I don’t understand why the CSC was not only the prior stressor but was also the acute stress condition both groups faced. To me, I feel like it would have made more sense to have the CSC be the prior stressor and then judge the effect on social behavior with maybe a three choice chamber test or te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington et al (2016) and Reber et al. (2016)

By
This week's articles were about the role of the gut-brain axis in neurodevelopment and stress. Reber and colleagues used a heat-killed version of the bacteria, M. vaccae, as a type of vaccine and found that administration to mouse models resulted in decreased response to chronic stress, prevented colitis related to stress, and reduced measures of anxiety. Reber et al. also used the inactivated M. vaccae in a mouse model of IBD and found that the bacteria prevented stress-induce flare-ups of colitis, but that this could be reversed by removing T cells. Buffington and colleagues instead examined the role of gut microbiota in maternal high-fat diets (MHFD) in the neurodevelopment and social behaviors of their offspring. Buffington et al. found that housing MHFD rats with the offspring of regular diet (MRD) rats prevented social deficits in their offspring. They also found that this co-housing arrangement prevented an imbalance in the gut bacteria Reber and colleagues' findings w...
Post a Comment
Read more