Skip to main content

Blog Post 4: Han et al. 2009 and Yiu et al. 2014

By
The papers by Han et al. and Yiu et al. demonstrate that neurons with increased CREB in the lateral amygdala (LA) are preferentially recruited into the memory trace, specifically with respect to a fear memory. The paper by Han et al. from 2009 underscores the necessity of this specific neuronal subpopulation by ablating these neurons, which resulted in a loss of the fear memory. The paper by Yiu et al. from 2014 builds on this further, explaining that increased excitability in LA neurons resulted in enhanced memory formation. While I believe that both papers provide very convincing and exciting data, I have a hard time understanding how this can be applicable in any clinical setting. 
The concept of ablating only the neurons that overexpress CREB and that are allocated to a specific fear memory, in order to permanently erase that memory, sounds lovely, especially with regards to treatment for PTSD. However, how this could ever be done in humans is beyond me. I do believe that the findings presented in both of these papers are important to a greater understanding of the way neurons in the amygdala encode a specific memory, but I think it is far away from being applicable clinically. Obviously we cannot ablate populations of neurons in humans, but do these findings point towards the need to target very specific brain areas when treating disorders like PTSD? Specifically, does this have any implications for possible uses of TMS to target circuitry in the BLA and hopefully relieve the symptoms of PTSD?
Also, the paper by Yiu et al. addressed the baseline level of anxiety of the mice to demonstrate that the freezing was caused by increasing excitability in LA neurons, rather than an overall increase in anxiety. To do so, they used open field and elevated plus maze, and their findings suggest that there was no significant difference in the levels of anxiety in the CREB, dnKCNQ2, or GFP (control) mice. However, they used both male and female mice in their study, and their only measure of fear was freezing. As we know, male and female rodents often display different phenotypes of fear and anxiety, so I would have liked to see a more in-depth analysis of fear expression and anxiety levels. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more