Skip to main content

Blog Post 4: Han et al. 2009 and Yiu et al. 2014

By
The papers by Han et al. and Yiu et al. demonstrate that neurons with increased CREB in the lateral amygdala (LA) are preferentially recruited into the memory trace, specifically with respect to a fear memory. The paper by Han et al. from 2009 underscores the necessity of this specific neuronal subpopulation by ablating these neurons, which resulted in a loss of the fear memory. The paper by Yiu et al. from 2014 builds on this further, explaining that increased excitability in LA neurons resulted in enhanced memory formation. While I believe that both papers provide very convincing and exciting data, I have a hard time understanding how this can be applicable in any clinical setting. 
The concept of ablating only the neurons that overexpress CREB and that are allocated to a specific fear memory, in order to permanently erase that memory, sounds lovely, especially with regards to treatment for PTSD. However, how this could ever be done in humans is beyond me. I do believe that the findings presented in both of these papers are important to a greater understanding of the way neurons in the amygdala encode a specific memory, but I think it is far away from being applicable clinically. Obviously we cannot ablate populations of neurons in humans, but do these findings point towards the need to target very specific brain areas when treating disorders like PTSD? Specifically, does this have any implications for possible uses of TMS to target circuitry in the BLA and hopefully relieve the symptoms of PTSD?
Also, the paper by Yiu et al. addressed the baseline level of anxiety of the mice to demonstrate that the freezing was caused by increasing excitability in LA neurons, rather than an overall increase in anxiety. To do so, they used open field and elevated plus maze, and their findings suggest that there was no significant difference in the levels of anxiety in the CREB, dnKCNQ2, or GFP (control) mice. However, they used both male and female mice in their study, and their only measure of fear was freezing. As we know, male and female rodents often display different phenotypes of fear and anxiety, so I would have liked to see a more in-depth analysis of fear expression and anxiety levels. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more