Skip to main content

Blog 4: Recruiting neurons to a memory trace

By

The papers this week discuss how a small population of lateral amygdala (LA) neurons are preferentially activated by fear memory expression, plus what factor(s) contribute to these neurons being recruited to the memory engram. Although both papers were quite interesting, I found myself puzzled by some of the specific experimental design choices. Beyond this, I also felt like there are several qualifiers to the researchers’ conclusions that left me intrigued but skeptical for how these findings can become clinically relevant.

Namely, what exactly is the relevance in the strength difference of an auditory fear memory? Han et al (2009) frequently referred to their findings in the contexts of “a weak memory” versus “a strong memory” or even “an intense protocol” without much further explanation. Even when Yiu et al (2014) talked about the effects of two different excitatory (dnKCNQ2) and inhibitory (Kir2.1) K+ channels, they specifically mention the use of weak auditory fear conditioning. My best response is that there simply exists some threshold for the intensity of the foot shock in order to elicit a baseline fear/freezing response that was determined and validated in previous studies. However, Han et al (2009) drew one conclusion that the reversal of CREB-enhanced memory was not due to memory extinction because their control groups froze robustly - yet they did not include any measure of baseline freezing. They also only used male mice, which is in (amazing) contrast to Yiu et al (2014) who used both male and female mice and reported that they saw no difference in baseline (pre-tone) freezing.

Another, but related, question I noted was in regard to general behavioral measures of fear other than freezing (or darting in females). Yiu et al (2014) did a control experiment looking for baseline levels of anxiety-like behavior through the elevated plus maze and open field test, and although I do agree this is absolutely relevant to fear measures, I cannot help but feel like the strokes being made are too broad from one thing to the next. Specifically, I’m not convinced that Yiu et al (2014) observing increased freezing in hM3Dq + CMO animals is enough to say that it "enhances memory formation." What it is actually telling, I am not quite sure. I feel as though there needs to be more confirming evidence outside of just freezing levels in this select population of neurons to indicate that a memory was truly formed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more