Skip to main content

Week 3: Dopamine circuits and recovery from stress

By

Chaudhury et al. and Tye et al. present two opposing viewpoints in regards to the mechanisms behind depression and depressive-like behavior. I was surprised to find that both these papers were published in the same issue of Nature in 2012. Whereas Chaudhury et al. establishes two links—one between the excitation of VTA dopaminergic neuron phasic firing patterns and a susceptibility to a depression-like phenotype as well as one between the inhibition of the same VTA neuronal projections to the nucleus accumbens (validated by a social defeat behavioral paradigm and sucrose preference test)—Tye et al. utilizes a tail-suspension test as a CMS paradigm as well as a sucrose preference test to claim that a reduced modulation of dopamine cell firing in the VTA causes depressive-like symptoms whereas the inhibition of VTA dopaminergic projection neurons to the nucleus accumbens increases depressive phenotypes. I would assert that both arguments are backed with adequate research models and extensive methodology sections, (using similar optogenetic, chemogenetic, and electrophysiology techniques to derive their conclusions), and hence both are sound and demonstrate validity. That being said, the question isn’t which paper is “right”, but rather, how can we use the combination of the two to further develop a model for how depression works. It’s a well known fact that depression is one of the most complex psychological phenomena, as it manifests itself in such a multitude of ways across the board. Furthermore, it’s often accompanied with various forms of anxiety—whether it be social, GAD, PTSD, etc.—and each individual prognosis expresses different symptomatic behavior. After reading the two review articles on Scientific American as well, it becomes clear that the Chaudhury et al. repeated social defeat paradigm attempts to induce a stress model that is objectively more severe than the chronic mild stress model used by Tye et al. It brought me to thinking about how although we often assume the mesolimbic dopamine system is modulated by more or less the same pathway, every different type of stress model causes varied downstream pathway effects, and we still have ways to go in the field before we truly understand depression in the brain. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more