Skip to main content

Week 3: Dopamine circuits and recovery from stress

By

Chaudhury et al. and Tye et al. present two opposing viewpoints in regards to the mechanisms behind depression and depressive-like behavior. I was surprised to find that both these papers were published in the same issue of Nature in 2012. Whereas Chaudhury et al. establishes two links—one between the excitation of VTA dopaminergic neuron phasic firing patterns and a susceptibility to a depression-like phenotype as well as one between the inhibition of the same VTA neuronal projections to the nucleus accumbens (validated by a social defeat behavioral paradigm and sucrose preference test)—Tye et al. utilizes a tail-suspension test as a CMS paradigm as well as a sucrose preference test to claim that a reduced modulation of dopamine cell firing in the VTA causes depressive-like symptoms whereas the inhibition of VTA dopaminergic projection neurons to the nucleus accumbens increases depressive phenotypes. I would assert that both arguments are backed with adequate research models and extensive methodology sections, (using similar optogenetic, chemogenetic, and electrophysiology techniques to derive their conclusions), and hence both are sound and demonstrate validity. That being said, the question isn’t which paper is “right”, but rather, how can we use the combination of the two to further develop a model for how depression works. It’s a well known fact that depression is one of the most complex psychological phenomena, as it manifests itself in such a multitude of ways across the board. Furthermore, it’s often accompanied with various forms of anxiety—whether it be social, GAD, PTSD, etc.—and each individual prognosis expresses different symptomatic behavior. After reading the two review articles on Scientific American as well, it becomes clear that the Chaudhury et al. repeated social defeat paradigm attempts to induce a stress model that is objectively more severe than the chronic mild stress model used by Tye et al. It brought me to thinking about how although we often assume the mesolimbic dopamine system is modulated by more or less the same pathway, every different type of stress model causes varied downstream pathway effects, and we still have ways to go in the field before we truly understand depression in the brain. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more