Skip to main content

Week 2: Tye and Chaudhury

By
The papers by Tye et al. and Chaudhury et al. both provide interesting research regarding the relationship between ventral tegmental area dopamine neuron activation and depressive behaviors. Both studies have a similar purpose looking into this relationship and use optogenetic techniques to observe and quantify the activation states of these specific VTA DA neurons. However, the procedures Chaudhury and Tye used were different and their conclusions were largely contrasting. Tye et al. concludes that the phasic activation of VTA DA neurons reverses depressive-like behaviors in stress-induced mice, specifically anhedonia and reduced motivation. The paper makes note that this effect is immediate and reversible as well, meaning that inhibition of the same dopaminergic neuronal projections to the VTA increases the depressive-like behaviors. On the other hand, Chaudhury et al. concludes that activation of the VTA dopamine neurons in a phasic neuronal pattern in stress-induced mice induces depressive-like behavior and that inhibiting the dopaminergic projections to the VTA reduces these behaviors. One explanation for these differing conclusions may due to their differing procedures.

 The studies both focus on the implementation and alleviation of depressive-like symptoms in stress-induced rodents but use different paradigms to implement the stress. Tye uses a chronic mild stress paradigm for 8-12 weeks while Chaudhury uses the social defeat paradigm. It is believed that the CMS is a gentler stress paradigm, which may have affected the level of stress induced and therefore the rodent’s response to alleviating efforts in the VTA DA neurons. Both studies used the sucrose preference test to test for anhedonia but Tye also used the Forced-Swim test while Chaudhury used the social interaction test to quantify other depressive behaviors. Although the researchers were probably limited by funds and time, it would be interesting to see the result of VTA DA activation and inhibition in regards to the many other symptoms of depression besides anhedonia, motivation, and social interaction. In humans, depression is a multifaceted disorder that is often hard to pinpoint because of its many possible symptoms. Better understanding each of these symptoms may provide a more targeted treatment.

I think both experiments were generally thorough and well-done, so their contrasting conclusions are that much more surprising. My guess for the discrepancy between results is due to the differences in the the stress-induction. The rodents in Tye’s experiment were likely subjected to a gentler form of stress than those in Chaudhury’s, so their positive response to the dopaminergic neuronal activation could be due to that. The rodents in Chaudhury’s experiment may have crossed a theoretical threshold of stress, turning their response to the DA activation negative and making them more susceptible to Depressive behaviors. We clearly do not fully understand why these results differ and the truly complex nature of stress and depression. More research into different types of stress and their relationship to depression may shed light on some of these answers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more