Skip to main content

Week 2: Neurogenesis and Anti-depressant actions response

By

The two articles selected this week, Santarelli et al. (2003) and Bessa et al. (2009), investigated neurogenesis in the hippocampus with administration of anti-depressants (ADs) and how it might affect the alleviation of behaviors associated with depression. Upon first glance, the articles seem to contradict each other. But with a more thorough read-through of the papers and an understanding that as time goes on, more discoveries are made within the neuroscience community. Santarelli et. al seems to be a necessary precursor to Bessa et al. in developing a deeper understanding of ADs.

In Santarelli et al., mice were subjected to a novelty-suppressed feeding task in order to study how ADs effect neurogenesis. This article discovered that disrupting the neurogenesis induced by ADs through use of radiation blocked the behavioral response to the ADs. The major finding of the paper was that the behavioral effects of ADs might be the result of stimulation of neurogenesis in the hippocampus. Bessa et al. takes this research in a different direction. It refutes the claim that neurogenesis in the hippocampus is reason for the amelioration of depressive symptoms with the use of ADs and instead takes the approach that neural plasticity is responsible for the amelioration of depressive symptoms. Bessa et al. also performs behavioral tasks on mice but with a more all-encompassing approach. This article uses a novelty-suppressed feeding task, a sucrose preference task, and a forced swimming task to assess the effects that ADs have rather than just the novelty-suppressed feeding task from Santarelli et al. paper. The takeaway from Bessa et al. was that ADs retain their therapeutic properties even with neurogenesis is blocked.

So although Bessa et al. rejects the claim that neurogenesis in the hippocampus with AD use is reason from the alleviation of behaviors associated with depression, it relies on previous research being done in this area to get to its new conclusion that neuroplasticity in the hippocampus with AD use is reason from the alleviation of behaviors associated with depression.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more