Skip to main content

Week 1: Santarelli and Bessa

By
The articles written by Santarelli and Bessa, both aim to explore the neuro-modulating effects which influence the behavioral changes associated with anti-depressant (AD) medication. In 2003, Santarelli hypothesized that neurogenesis in the hippocampus was the primary mechanism of action of ADs which leads to an improvement in depressive-like behavior in rodents. They confirmed this hypothesis by measuring feeding latency in a novelty-suppressed feeding (NSF) test, often used to assess depression in rodent models. After treatment with several AD medications, and evaluation of behavioral tests, it was concluded that neurogenesis in the hippocampus played a major role in the behavioral modification of depressed rodents by measuring neurogenic factors in the subjects associated with neurogenesis.

The Bessa study was conducted 6 years after the publication of Santarelli's article concluding the effect of neurogenesis on behavioral modifications of ADs. The Bessa paper includes a far more comprehensive array of both behavioral and structural analyses post treatment with ADs. Their study also included the use of a cytostatic agent, methylazoxymethanol (MAM). This drug inhibited neurogenesis and was co-administered with the ADs in the different subgroups of animals. With the inhibition of neurogenesis, it was found that the behavioral modifications of ADs persisted in the chronic mild stress (CMS) animals. Meaning, the reversal of depressive-like behaviors was not dependent on hippocampal neurogenesis. They further explain the causality of the improvements of depressive-like behavior and accredit the improvements to neuronal plastic changes, rather than the birth of new neurons.

When analyzing the differences between the Santarelli and Bessa article, I found it most interesting that Bessa does not refute the finding of Santarelli, but builds off of them. Bessa does not deny the occurrence of neurogenesis as a result of the introduction of ADs, however, they do prove with the use of the cytostatic agent MAM that this is not the primary modulator of the behavioral effects of AD medication. In their discussion they introduce the idea of neurogenesis being important for the reduction of anxiety-like symptoms in rodents. As discussed by Bessa, while neurogenesis is not required for behavioral modification of depression with ADs, it does appear to play a vital role in their anxiolytic effects. This would be an interesting place for further research and development for a new hypothesis of the role of neurogenesis in the behavioral effects of modulating serotonergic pathways.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more