Skip to main content

Week 1: Neurogenesis & Anti-depressant actions

By

In 2003, Santarelli et al. confirmed the existence of a link between the stimulation of neurogenesis by antidepressants (ADs) and how this contributes to their behavioral effects. A mere five years later—though this may be considered eons in the fast-paced world of neurobiological and technological advancements—Bessa et al. published a rebuttal elucidating that ADs work even when neurogenesis was halted through administration of methylazoxymethanol (MAM). This critique pushed forth the theory that neuronal plasticity is more crucial than neurogenesis to experience behavioral effects of ADs. Nevertheless, it complimented the preceding idea with the stance that stimulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis may be necessary, it is not sufficient to produce the behavioral effects of ADs.

To study the functional implication of such observations, Bessa et al. (2008) used an unpredictable chronic mild stress (CMS) paradigm to induce symptoms of depressive behaviors in rat models. Standard behavioral assays were used to assess anhedonia, learned helplessness, and anxiety-like behaviors. After the induction of stress, a recovery experiment commenced using four different antidepressants alongside the cytostatic drug MAM to attenuate neurogenesis. Characterization of therapeutic efficacy was done using mRNA expression studies of genes heavily implicated in synaptic remodeling and plasticity in the PFC (this is a step up from Santarelli et al. among other things).  

Although the mechanisms and pathology of depression still remain unclear, we know that both neural plasticity and neurogenesis are disrupted in depression. That being said, the findings of Bessa et al. are in accordance with those of Santarelli et al., though the difference in time period reflects the methodology and subsequent interpretation of the results acquired. From my understanding, Santarelli et al. completed what experimenters of the early 2000s would have deemed a proper and thorough investigation. The results are not inaccurate, but in due time we could see that they are also not complete. Bessa et al. took advantage of more modern-day techniques to assert that there’s more to the story than we initially thought. It’s only a matter of time before another scientist sees a hole in the combination of these two and sets forth an additional mechanism—being that depression is so complex.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gut-Brain Interactions: Buffington et al, Reber et al 2016

By
April 13 Papers (Buffington et. al, Reber et. al) I found this week’s papers to be quite novel in that they both proposed potential treatments for neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders that target bacterial or microbial abnormalities and how these give rise to certain behavioral and physical symptoms associated with the disorders. I thought this was a very unusual yet interesting approach, and as I have not previously studied the gut-brain axis, these papers offered me a fresh perspective on researching psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. They were also unconventional in their focus of the physical symptoms that often accompany mental disorders, as this is not something that I have seen many other papers touch upon very much. Particularly, I was surprised by the Reber et al paper’s focus on the link between psychiatric disorders and inflammation in organs other than the brain, such as the colon, and the Buffington et al paper’s description of a relationship between ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gut-brain axis

By
This weeks papers Reber et al. 2016 and Buffington et al. 2016 present a super interesting look into the gut-brain axis. Regarding both of these papers, it was amazing to see how potent favorable or unfavorable gut microbiome compositions are in affecting neuronal signaling and overall behavior. Reber et al. shows how immunoregulatory immunization with specifically heat killed M.vaccae can serve as a protective factor against chronic subordinate stress induce colotis as well as behavioral symptoms due to chronic stress as such. Interestringly, this paper depleted regulatory T cell activity via the anti CD25 antibody in order to show that the antiinflammatory mechanism induced by m vaccae immunization is depented on the secondary regulatory mechanisms offered by Treg proliferation and signaling. But, when T reg signaling was removed, this did not seem to cause a significant change in behavior . Therefore, this begs the consideration of what othe rmechanisms may be at play in order ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ramirez et al.: 2013 and 2015 Papers

By
In these papers, Ramirez et al. strive to understand how memory encoding via optogenetic manipulation of engram-bearing cells in the hippocampus, specifically the dentate gyrus, can affect an animal’s response to a stressful context.  The first paper, published in 2013, was crucial to the field as it introduced this very exciting technique; in this paper, Ramirez et al. use tet-tag to manipulate brain circuity and establish associations between two contexts. Throughout the paper, this is referred to as “false memories.” Using these artificial memories, the investigators are able to manipulate the animal’s fear response in a specific context. Specifically, after the animals are conditioned to a repeated fearful stimulus (a foot shock, in context B), activation of the involved DG cells in a different context (context A’) will also initiate a fear response (in absence of any foot shock). In this experiment, the false memory is used to create an unnatural fear association in a given...
Post a Comment
Read more