Skip to main content

Post 3- Ramirez et al. 2013, 2015

By

This week an article by Ramirez et al. 2013, introduces the ability to create false memories in the hippocampus by optically stimulating cells that are associated with positive memory during negative events. This idea is then implemented two years later in the paper by Ramirez et al. 2015, where they activate cells associated with positive memory to suppress depression like behaviors in mice. 

The 2013 paper began by identifying a small population of granule cells in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus that coded for contextual memory. They utilized doxycycline (DOX) fed mice and upon withdrawal to DOX and introduction of these mice into a novel context A, the cells of the DG that encoded this environment were activated. These mice also contained the transgene TRE-ChR2-mCherry, that upon DOX withdrawal elicited fluorescent expression allowing for the labelling of the specific cells that encoded the context A. (Fig 1B,C) Then to determine whether a novel fear memory could be encoded as a “false memory” associated with context A, they used optogenetics and upon light illumination of the particular cells encoding context A, they exposed the mice to a fear conditioning context B (foot shock). They then exposed the mice either back to context A or a novel context C. The animals placed back in context A displayed increased levels of A relative to context C and control mice expressing only mCherry. The rest of the experiments in this paper focused on experiments control for potential confounding variables such as; mCherry influence, different brain structures that may be involved (CA1) and the interaction between the false and fear memories. To me the most important part of the 2013 paper by Ramirez et al. was their supported hypothesis of the ability to induce false fear memories by optogenetic light activation. This idea was then carried forward by them for therapeutic effects for depression in their 2015 paper. 

The 2015 paper by Ramirez et al. used the previous work to test whether activating positive memories, stored in memory engram cells of the dentate gyrus,  artificially was enough to suppress depression like behaviors. They did this using the previously mentioned methods of DOX withdrawal. Upon withdrawal, cells in the DG expressing ChR2-mCherry were activated allowing for fluorescent labelling and optogenetic light activation during positive, neutral or negative experiences. The mice were then exposed to 10 days of chronic immobilization stress (CIS) and put through tests of anxiety (as we have learned through previous papers) such as: open field test, elevated plus maze, tail suspension test and sucrose preference test. The CIS group as expected displayed a decreased time in struggling and preference for sucrose. They then used light to activate the DG cells associated with the positive experience and noticed an acute increase in time spent struggling and levels of sucrose preference that matched the unstressed group. (Fig. 1 b,c) They also noticed decreased latency to feed in the novelty suppressed feeding test. This set of experiments support their hypothesis that activating positively associated cells in the DG suppress depressive like behaviors induced in mice. The rest of the paper includes experiments to understand the neural mechanisms underlying this process. They observed the necessary projections of the DG to the basolateral amygdala to the nucleus accumbens for the functionality of these memory engram cells. And finally looked at whether chronic activation of positive memory cells would elicit long lasting depression related behaviors.

There is a lot to unpack within the 2015 paper, however, my favorite part of this week's readings were the information I described about each of the papers and how the discovery of a method for false memory encoding was able to instigate research in the direction of psychological disorder therapeutics. This is entirely what I find interesting about scientific research and the reason I chose Neuroscience as a major. It is fascinating to watch the development and progression of therapeutic research in such a short time as shown by the quick succession of work between 2013 and 2015 by Ramirez et al. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2- Dopamine Modulation of Depressive-like Behaviors

By
The Chaudhury et al paper explored the neural circuit mechanisms involved in the dopamine modulation of certain symptoms of depression. In this study, the researchers looked at social interaction and sucrose preference as part of their social-defeat paradigm, which has been shown in the past to be indicative of depressive-like behaviors. Although I initially did not completely see the connection between the social-defeat stress model of depression and the tonic vs phasic firing of dopamine neurons, it seemed that susceptibility and resilience to stress played a role in the functional/behavioral effects of dopamine firing. It was interesting to see how chronic mild stress with phasic firing of VTA dopamine neurons converted even resilient mice into susceptible mice.  The Tye et al paper similarly looked at the dopamine modulation of depressive-like behaviors, focusing on motivation with the forced swim tests and open field tests, followed by measurement of anhedonia by quantifyi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sial & Allsop

By
Sial et al. derived a novel approach for studying what they deem vicarious defeat stress (VSDS) as a model for MDD, PTSD, and other mood-related disorders as an alternative to the classical CSDS paradigm. Using adult male mice, they demonstrate that their model induces a robust and measurable social avoidant phenotype as well as other stress and anxiety related behavioral outputs. Their subsequent rescue study with chronic fluoxetine treatment shows reversal of the behavioral phenotypes and emphasizes the predictive validity of the model. Allsop et al. found that BLA-projecting ACC neurons preferentially encode socially derived aversive cue information by encoding the demonstrator’s distress response during observational learning, hence enabling acquisition of negative valence of cue by BLA neurons and behavioral output. In order to test their hypothesis, Allsop et al. used an observational fear conditional paradigm to create association between a conditioned stimulu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buffington and Reber

By
Buffington et al. explore a mechanism by which maternal obesity can induce neuronal and subsequent behavioral disorders. Using a model of high-fat diet (MHFD)-induced obesity, the authors showcase the strong connection between the brain and the gut, and its impact on behavior. The findings are provocative; by exposing these offspring to the microbiome of control offspring, there was evidence of a rescued observed behavioral phenotype. Furthermore, a phylogenetic profiling of the gut microbiome revealed a decrease in L. reuteri within MHFD offspring, and introduction of live L. reuteri into the drinking water shows successful rescue of the behavioral issues in the MHFD offspring. L. reuteri-induced expression of oxytocin within the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus provides a potential mechanistic explanation for the behavioral changes. I thought this paper provided robust support for the hypothesized interaction between the gut biome and the developing CNS, with tremendous po...
Post a Comment
Read more